Skip to content

Issues: dynaconf/dynaconf

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

111 Open 439 Closed
111 Open 439 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Environment variable for array question
#1165 opened Jul 22, 2024 by molntamas
3
[RFC] Deprecate init and write commands on 4.0.0 4.0-breaking-change CLI enhancement Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC
#1163 opened Jul 12, 2024 by rochacbruno
1
[RFC] Disambiguation when using dot notation with integer keys 4.0-breaking-change typed_dynaconf
#1161 opened Jul 11, 2024 by jyejare 4.0.0
7
[RFC]Change the semantics of layered environments 4.0-breaking-change Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC
#1157 opened Jul 8, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Remove the default DYNACONF_ envvar prefix and all loaders disabled by default 4.0-breaking-change Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC
#1156 opened Jul 8, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC]Change how merge works on 4.0.0 4.0-breaking-change Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC
#1155 opened Jul 8, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
2
[RFC] Implement Secret type Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1152 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
5
[RFC] Improve Validator messages 4.0-breaking-change Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1151 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Allow definition of loaders on Options class Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1150 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Remove upperfy() 4.0-breaking-change Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1149 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Support datetime and multiple str->datetime coercions Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1148 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC]Implement Factory for lazy defaults Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1147 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Implement OnFailure recover Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1146 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Implement Typed DjangoDynaconf Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1145 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC]Implement typed FlaskDynaconf Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1144 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] on Validator, replace cast with pre_validation 4.0-breaking-change Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1143 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Implement option to coerce values on loading 4.0-breaking-change Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1142 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
1
[RFC]Generate Schema from runtime Dynaconf Instance Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1141 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC]typed: Generate Sample Config File from Schema Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1140 opened Jul 7, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Implement Validator Expressions Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1139 opened Jul 6, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC] Add description text to the fields Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1138 opened Jul 6, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
1
[RFC] Implement name aliases Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1137 opened Jul 6, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
1
[RFC] Implement Immutable annotation Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1136 opened Jul 6, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC]typed: Add option to forbid/ignore extra values Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1135 opened Jul 6, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
[RFC]typed: Add support for Any type Not a Bug Not a Problem, expected behavior RFC typed_dynaconf
#1134 opened Jul 6, 2024 by rochacbruno 4.0.0
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.