Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test for running lots of DKGs back to back #1329

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 14, 2024

Conversation

CluEleSsUK
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@AnomalRoil AnomalRoil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just tests, lgtm

demo/demo_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 511 to 513
if n.Index() == leader.Index() || done[n.PublicAddr()] {
continue
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can done[n.PublicAddr()] be true at any time in that loop? 😮
Are there duplicated nodes in except(e.reshareNodes[1:], e.newNodes)?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for some reason this was failing - I didn't think there could be duplicate nodes, but this solved it

@CluEleSsUK CluEleSsUK merged commit 0a1617d into feature/drand-v2.0.0 May 14, 2024
46 of 50 checks passed
@CluEleSsUK CluEleSsUK deleted the feature/run-many-dkgs branch May 14, 2024 15:15
CluEleSsUK added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
* test for running lots of DKGs back to back

* reduce period
AnomalRoil pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2024
* test for running lots of DKGs back to back

* reduce period
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants