Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to access built-in schema #14

Closed
giautm opened this issue Nov 27, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Allow to access built-in schema #14

giautm opened this issue Nov 27, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@giautm
Copy link
Contributor

giautm commented Nov 27, 2017

I want to attach directives to schema resolvers, one way to do this is manual setup schema and pass it to GraphQL server (to much imports are required). Easy way is allow to accees schema.

@giautm
Copy link
Contributor Author

giautm commented Nov 27, 2017

i will open a PR soon. :)

@Urigo
Copy link
Collaborator

Urigo commented Mar 29, 2022

Hey, @Urigo from The Guild here!

You might know us from projects such as graphql-code-generator, envelop or graphql-tools.

For a long time we thought that the Javascript ecosystem is still missing a lightweight cross-platform, but still highly customizable GraphQL Server.

In the past the awesome Prisma team took on that great challenge and now we are happy to announce that we are continuing them and just released GraphQL Yoga 2.0 - Build fast, extensible, and batteries-included (Subscriptions, Serverless, File uploads support) GraphQL APIs in Node.js 🚀

And regarding the issue here, Yoga is completely separated from the way you do HTTP or create your schema, so any schema solution you use will work with Yoga!

We have been working a long time on version 2.0 and have been using it in our clients projects for a few months now and shared a couple of alpha cycles here.
Thank you all for your feedback and suggestions, you made this release possible!

Please try Yoga out again, give us feedback and help us spread the word on the new release!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants