Request for Review: TAG App Delivery - WG Infrastructure Lifecycle #1383
Comments
|
/vote |
Vote created@riaankleinhans has called for a vote on The members of the following teams have binding votes:
Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support! How to voteYou can cast your vote by reacting to
Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted. The vote will be open for |
|
Would https://cluster-api.sigs.k8s.io/ etc fall under this WG? |
|
@rchincha Yes, it would fall under this WG. |
|
/check-vote |
Vote statusSo far Summary
Binding votes (0)
|
| User | Vote | Timestamp |
|---|---|---|
| roberthstrand | In favor | 2024-07-29 18:31:21.0 00:00:00 |
| abangser | In favor | 2024-07-29 18:49:19.0 00:00:00 |
| GenPage | In favor | 2024-07-29 19:23:57.0 00:00:00 |
| bschaatsbergen | In favor | 2024-07-29 22:25:15.0 00:00:00 |
| thschue | In favor | 2024-07-30 1:52:31.0 00:00:00 |
| elft3r | In favor | 2024-07-30 8:56:38.0 00:00:00 |
| stmcginnis | In favor | 2024-07-30 19:13:48.0 00:00:00 |
| rynowak | In favor | 2024-07-30 22:39:22.0 00:00:00 |
Hello TOC, another working group in the making from TAG App Delivery 😎
Background
One key concern of those who run applications in cloud native environments is to develop and orchestrate infrastructure. This is a very extensive topic, and is out of scope for the other working groups. For this reason, members of the TAG want to start the Infrastructure Lifecycle Working Group.
Action Request
Please provide your feedback and approval on the proposed group and its charter in this PR.
We would also like the TOC to approve @GenPage, @rynowak, @bschaatsbergen, and @elft3r as WG Co-Chairs. Note: We are aware that even-number of chairs can be a problem in the case of a tie in voting. If that scenario happens, we will appoint a representative from the TAG App Delivery leadership to function as a tie-breaker.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: