Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add feature flag to allow enabling FileSystemAccess API. #10785

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 1, 2021

Conversation

mkarolin
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes brave/brave-browser#18979

Submitter Checklist:

  • I confirm that no security/privacy review is needed, or that I have requested one
  • There is a ticket for my issue
  • Used Github auto-closing keywords in the PR description above
  • Wrote a good PR/commit description
  • Added appropriate labels (QA/Yes or QA/No; release-notes/include or release-notes/exclude; OS/...) to the associated issue
  • Checked the PR locally: npm run test -- brave_browser_tests, npm run test -- brave_unit_tests, npm run lint, npm run gn_check, npm run tslint
  • Ran git rebase master (if needed)

Reviewer Checklist:

  • A security review is not needed, or a link to one is included in the PR description
  • New files have MPL-2.0 license header
  • Adequate test coverage exists to prevent regressions
  • Major classes, functions and non-trivial code blocks are well-commented
  • Changes in component dependencies are properly reflected in gn
  • Code follows the style guide
  • Test plan is specified in PR before merging

After-merge Checklist:

Test Plan:

@mkarolin mkarolin self-assigned this Oct 30, 2021
@mkarolin mkarolin requested review from a team as code owners October 30, 2021 01:04
Copy link
Contributor

@pes10k pes10k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Member

@goodov goodov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

with few nits

} // namespace features
} // namespace blink


Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

unnecessary empty line

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 8aa596d

if (IsFileSystemAccessAPIEnabled()) {
auto result =
content::EvalJs(main_frame(), "typeof self.showOpenFilePicker");
EXPECT_TRUE(*result.value.GetIfString() == "function")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the dereference will crash if GetIfString returns nullptr, so we won't see DebugString() value at all. I'd go with:

ASSERT_TRUE(result.value.is_string());
EXPECT_EQ(result.value.GetString(), "function");

or just:

EXPECT_EQ(result.value.GetString(), "function");

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great catch. Fixed in 8aa596d with the second option.

} else {
auto result = content::EvalJs(main_frame(), "self.showOpenFilePicker()");
EXPECT_TRUE(
result.error.find("self.showOpenFilePicker is not a function") !=
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

base::Contains

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in 8aa596d

@mkarolin mkarolin merged commit b50d5ad into master Nov 1, 2021
@mkarolin mkarolin deleted the maxk-file-system-access-feature branch November 1, 2021 19:12
@mkarolin mkarolin added this to the 1.33.x - Nightly milestone Nov 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants