Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Soil moisture in wrong units for some datasets #240

Open
arthur-e opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Soil moisture in wrong units for some datasets #240

arthur-e opened this issue Dec 18, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@arthur-e
Copy link

According to the 2020 paper in Global Change Biology, soil moisture in the "data" tables should be in volumetric m^3/m^3 but this seems to vary by dataset. "d20200114_CARBONE_BURNS", "d20190526_RAICH_survey", and "d20200328_UEYAMA_HOKUROKU" are three (there may be more) that seem to have soil moisture in percent (%) units.

> csr_table('data', 'd20190526_RAICH_survey')
d20190526_RAICH_survey	Reading standardized data
# A tibble: 4,858 x 10
   CSR_PORT CSR_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN CSR_TIMESTAMP_END   CSR_FLUX_CO2 CSR_DRY_CO2 CSR_RH CSR_SM5 CSR_T5 CSR_TAIR_AMB
      <int> <dttm>              <dttm>                     <dbl>       <dbl>  <dbl>   <dbl>  <dbl>        <dbl>
 1        3 2004-09-29 10:08:30 2004-09-29 10:10:00         7.92        423    78.1    24.3   25           26.6
 2        3 2004-09-29 10:14:30 2004-09-29 10:16:00         6.94        399    74.3    37.8   24.7         26.6
 3        3 2004-09-29 10:18:30 2004-09-29 10:20:00         7.67        417.   77.2    36.9   25           26.7

For now, I'm going to assume datasets with a maximum soil moisture value < 1 are in m^3/m^3 units and those with a max. > 1 are in percent units.

@arthur-e
Copy link
Author

Also, at least one dataset has negative soil moisture values!

> csr_table('data', 'd20200212_KAYE_UNW')
d20200212_KAYE_UNW	Reading standardized data
# A tibble: 14,707 x 7
   CSR_PORT CSR_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN CSR_TIMESTAMP_END   CSR_FLUX_CO2 CSR_SM5 CSR_T5 CSR_DATASET       
      <int> <dttm>              <dttm>                     <dbl>   <dbl>  <dbl> <chr>             
 1        0 2015-07-13 23:51:30 2015-07-13 23:53:00         5.6   -0.840   19.0 d20200212_KAYE_UNW
 2        0 2015-07-14 00:51:30 2015-07-14 00:53:00         5.77  -0.837   18.9 d20200212_KAYE_UNW

@bpbond
Copy link
Owner

bpbond commented Dec 18, 2020

Thanks @arthur-e ! Great to identify. I will investigate about the fraction vs. percentage thing—ugh, tests should catch this.

The negative issue, hmm, separate but good to know. Thanks.

@arthur-e
Copy link
Author

arthur-e commented Aug 4, 2021

I hate to pile on here, but there are a couple of other datasets to note. Below are percentiles for the CSR_SM5 field (5-cm soil moisture). The TP39 dataset has the correct units (m3 m-3) but the other two do not seem to be correct, i.e., there is too little variation around (and above) 1.0 for these to be in percent units.

Dataset Port Flux 1% 10% 50% 90% 99%
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 1 Rs 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.15 0.19
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 2 Rs 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.15 0.20
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 3 Rh 0.06 0.06 0.11 0.15 0.21
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 4 Rs 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.15 0.20
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 5 Rs 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.14 0.19
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 6 Rs 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.14 0.19
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 7 Rs 0.06 0.06 0.10 0.14 0.18
d20200417_ARAIN_TP39 8 Rh 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.14 0.18
d20200417_ARAIN_TP74 1 Rs 1.09 1.15 1.21 1.45 1.63
d20200417_ARAIN_TP74 2 Rs 1.19 1.21 1.32 1.56 1.65
d20200417_ARAIN_TP74 3 Rs 1.19 1.21 1.38 1.59 1.71
d20200417_ARAIN_TP74 4 Rs 1.18 1.25 1.48 1.59 1.66
d20200417_ARAIN_TPD 1 Rs 0.19 0.76 0.89 1.11 2.04
d20200417_ARAIN_TPD 2 Rs 0.78 0.88 1.05 1.15 1.50
d20200417_ARAIN_TPD 3 Rs 0.03 0.17 0.91 1.12 3.47
d20200417_ARAIN_TPD 4 Rs 0.77 0.81 1.03 1.11 1.18
d20200417_ARAIN_TPD 5 Rs 0.73 0.75 1.00 1.09 1.15

I might reach out to the authors and see if they can clarify. I assume they would have the option of uploading correcting data to COSORE.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants