Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate BeanIO with JBatch #102

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Integrate BeanIO with JBatch #102

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Hi

Would be great to get JBatch components for BeanIO. I think it makes sense if 
BeanIO provides it itself.

BatchEE has a version ATM (not yet released) but we would be happy to let you 
take this code since it makes more sense to handle components on the feature 
side rather than the technical one ; here is the code: 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-batchee.git;a=tree;f=extensi
ons/beanio;h=25473a9ae5e19be149ae2844d67e134ec9e26362;hb=ef1cfc57effbac704c9a7dd
7fca497b7214337aa

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 15 Jan 2014 at 6:33

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

First I've heard of JBatch, but yes, that might make sense.  Is that code 
working or does it need more work?

Thanks,
Kevin

Original comment by [email protected] on 17 Jan 2014 at 3:11

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Hi

This code works and is tested - see src/test - (but with batchee snapshot since 
it is not yet released, you should be able to replace it with ibm RI if that's 
a big issue)

Original comment by [email protected] on 17 Jan 2014 at 6:11

  • Added labels: ****
  • Removed labels: ****

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Jan 2014 at 3:51

  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants