Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[style]: Revamp Refund Policy Page Styling #3312

Open
4 of 5 tasks
akshay0611 opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #3313
Open
4 of 5 tasks

[style]: Revamp Refund Policy Page Styling #3312

akshay0611 opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 1 comment · May be fixed by #3313
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@akshay0611
Copy link
Contributor

What's the style idea?

We need to improve the content of the Refund Policy page to make it more structured, clear, and user-friendly. This includes updates to the refund eligibility criteria, non-refundable items, refund process, and timelines.

Add screenshots

Before: Screenshot showing the previous content.

Screenshot 2024-11-20 at 10 17 23 AM

After: Screenshot showing the updated content with the new structure and details.

Screenshot 2024-11-20 at 10 18 00 AM

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
  • I have read the Contributing Guidelines
  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
  • I'm a GSSoC'24 contributor
  • I want to work on this issue
@akshay0611 akshay0611 added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 20, 2024
Copy link

👋 Thanks for opening this issue! We appreciate your contribution. Please make sure you’ve provided all the necessary details and screenshots, and don't forget to follow our Guidelines and Code of Conduct. Happy coding! 🚀

@akshay0611 akshay0611 linked a pull request Nov 20, 2024 that will close this issue
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant