-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
Issues: asyncapi/spec
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Divide "Maintainer" role into two categories: Triager and Committer
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
#1041
by quetzalliwrites
was closed Mar 25, 2024
testing -input command not found
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
stale
#1030
by adrianatrevinoe
was closed Oct 10, 2024
Undefined behaviour of "messageId" for Message Traits and Messages defined in components.
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
stale
#1014
by tomsfernandez
was closed Sep 30, 2024
Undefined description when using A question about the spec or processes
stale
OneOf
, AllOf
or AnyOf
❔ Question
#1013
by jaymorelli96
was closed Sep 28, 2024
Send/Receive again confusion
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
#1011
by skonik
was closed Jan 2, 2024
Channel parameter type
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
stale
#1010
by Tenischev
was closed Sep 5, 2024
Should the Reply Object extend from the Operation Object?
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
stale
#1009
by smoya
was closed Aug 16, 2024
Invite Heiko Henning to join as code owner
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
#1008
by fmvilas
was closed Feb 6, 2024
Fix description of Operation Trait object
🤷♀️ Ambiguity
An issue/PR which identifies or fixes spec ambiguity
good first issue
#994
by smoya
was closed Feb 5, 2024
Add operationId for the reply
stale
💭 Strawman (RFC 0)
RFC Stage 0 (See CONTRIBUTING.md)
#981
by Tenischev
was closed Aug 17, 2024
Provide definition for the reply
stale
💭 Strawman (RFC 0)
RFC Stage 0 (See CONTRIBUTING.md)
#980
by Tenischev
was closed Jul 25, 2024
Shouldn't we remove A question about the spec or processes
messageId
in v3?
❔ Question
#978
by derberg
was closed Nov 7, 2023
Feedback on /docs/reference/specification/v2.0.0 - Tue, 29 Aug 2023 17:06:53 GMT
stale
#975
by derberg
was closed May 26, 2024
dotnet message validation
❔ Question
A question about the spec or processes
#973
by hfroliveira
was closed Sep 28, 2023
Support for $ref in examples with $id in the reference
💡 Proposal (RFC 1)
RFC Stage 1 (See CONTRIBUTING.md)
stale
#972
by nilkanth987
was closed Oct 1, 2024
Add logo of new silver sponsor and remove old platinum
area/docs
Specify what technical area given issue relates to. Its goal is to ease filtering good first issues.
enhancement
good first issue
released on @next-major-spec
released
#966
by derberg
was closed Sep 27, 2023
Add logo of bronze sponsors to readme
📑 docs
good first issue
released on @next-major-spec
released
#961
by derberg
was closed Aug 29, 2023
Previous Next
ProTip!
Adding no:label will show everything without a label.