Perhaps we could leave args in amber as it is and add a function in std or another library that supplies the script name (ie $0).

@rbtylee Do you think that this would be too dramatic of a change? Perhaps for the skilled Bash developers this would be an anomaly to add $0 to the argument array. For most of the programming languages the args array start with the $0.

@Ph0enixKM, I suppose I am thinking more in terms of backward compatibility. But considering the lack of much significant Amber code backward compatibility does not really matter much. And you raise a fair point.

@rbtylee Since Amber is in it's early alpha stage I think that this is the best moment to introduce some of the breaking changes

Closing as the code it's there and for the documentation we have a different repository that has to align with all the stuff.

amber-lang/amber-docs#34