Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

dpad up movement shifts focus to "back" interface button #11

Open
devilalice opened this issue Jan 26, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

dpad up movement shifts focus to "back" interface button #11

devilalice opened this issue Jan 26, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@devilalice
Copy link

On my android phone Ruggear RG160 the usage of dpad is preferable, as no touch screen at all and the touch emulation is not easy to use. So in this game it's possible move and choose the step with dpad only - that's awesome ! But UP movement moves the position up on board as well as totally shift the focus selection to the "back" app button (above the board). To restore focus I have to press DPAD DOWN - it returns the focus and doesn't move position down, so it's still possible to play with dpad only, but requires add DPAD DOWN press on any up movement. Is it possible to block focus shifting, please ?
Insti pushed a commit to Insti/droidzebra that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2019
@panstromek @oers
Fix loading settings (Fixes alkom#11)
178eab3 
* chore: outsource default settings from layout to separate resource file

* fix: sync default setting values in resource and DroidZebra

* disable animations by default

* enable practice mode and engine function Human vs human by default
@oers
Copy link

oers commented Jul 27, 2019

If you want you could raise an issue at https://github.com/oers/reversatile, if this bug ist still present in reversatile (an up to date clone of this app)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@oers @devilalice