Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: increase color picker zIndex on open #10540

Merged

Conversation

johnsoncherian
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@TooljetBot
Copy link
Collaborator

TooljetBot commented Jul 31, 2024

Code Review Agent Run #5e9886

  • AI Based Review: ✔️ Successful

High-level Feedback

Consider using React refs to manage DOM elements to align with React's declarative nature and avoid potential issues with direct DOM manipulation. Ensure the 'id' prop is validated or used within the function to prevent potential issues and confusion.

Actionable Issues

📄 frontend/src/Editor/Components/ColorPicker.jsx
Issues: Total - 2, High importance - 2
Line 14-14 🔴 High importance - 1   
Line 50-55 🔴 High importance - 1   

AI Code Review powered by Bito Logo

@@ -11,6 11,7 @@ export const ColorPicker = function ({
height,
fireEvent,
dataCy,
id,
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bito Code Review Agent Run #5e9886 - 07/31/2024, 08:45 am

🔴 High importance
Issue: The 'id' prop is added to the function signature, but there is no validation or usage of this prop within the function. This can lead to potential issues if the 'id' is expected to be used or validated.
Fix: Ensure that the 'id' prop is either used within the function or validated to confirm its necessity. If it is not required, consider removing it to avoid confusion.
Code suggestion
 @@ -14,6  14,10 @@
     id,
 }) {
   const { visibility, boxShadow } = styles;
   const defaultColor = properties.defaultColor;
   const [showColorPicker, setShowColorPicker] = useState(false);
   const [color, setColor] = useState(defaultColor);
   
    // Validate the id prop
    if (!id) {
      console.warn('ColorPicker component requires a valid id prop.');
    }
  
   const getRGBAValueFromHex = (hex) => {
     let c = hex.substring(1).split('');

Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?

  • it was incorrectly flagged

Comment on lines 50 to 55
useEffect(() => {
const element = document.querySelector(`.ele-${id}`);
if (element) {
element.style.zIndex = showColorPicker ? '3' : '';
}
}, [showColorPicker, id]);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bito Code Review Agent Run #5e9886 - 07/31/2024, 08:45 am

🔴 High importance
Issue: The useEffect hook directly manipulates the DOM to set the zIndex. This approach can lead to potential issues with React's reconciliation process and can cause unexpected behavior if the component re-renders frequently.
Fix: Consider using React refs to manage the DOM element and its properties. This approach is more in line with React's declarative nature and can help avoid potential issues with direct DOM manipulation.
Code suggestion
 @@ -48,0  50,12 @@
    const elementRef = useRef(null);
  
    useEffect(() => {
      if (elementRef.current) {
        elementRef.current.style.zIndex = showColorPicker ? '3' : '';
      }
    }, [showColorPicker]);
  
    return (
      <div ref={elementRef} className={'ele-${id}'}>
        {/* existing component code */}
      </div>

Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?

  • it was incorrectly flagged

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 31, 2024

@kavinvenkatachalam kavinvenkatachalam merged commit 3a6f551 into fix/appbuilder-stability-and-ui Jul 31, 2024
31 checks passed
@kavinvenkatachalam kavinvenkatachalam deleted the fix/colorpicker-zindex branch July 31, 2024 12:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants