Hotfix: REST API multiform data missing boundary on headers #10505
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
akshaysasidrn
added
run-ci
|
Deployment: https://tooljet-pr-10505.onrender.com |
Code Review Agent Run #1b4eb0
High-level FeedbackEnsure that headers are in the expected key-value pair format before processing them to avoid runtime errors. Add validation to check for key conflicts between 'queryHeaders' and 'sourceHeaders' before merging to prevent unintended overwrites or data loss. Check that the content type string is defined before calling 'toLowerCase()' to avoid runtime errors. Consider using 'Object.fromEntries' for converting header arrays to objects for better performance.Actionable Issues
📄 plugins/packages/common/lib/utils.helper.ts
Issues: Total - 2, High importance - 2
📄 plugins/packages/common/lib/oauth.ts
Issues: Total - 2, High importance - 2
AI Code Review powered by |
|
TooljetBot
reviewed
Jul 29, 2024
| hasDataSource = true | ||
| ): { [k: string]: string } => { | ||
| const cleanHeaders = (headers) => | ||
| headers.filter(([_, v]) => !isEmpty(v)).map(([k, v]) => [k.trim().toLowerCase(), v]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #1b4eb0 - 07/29/2024, 11:46 am
🔴 High importance
Issue: The 'cleanHeaders' function uses 'headers.filter(([_, v]) => !isEmpty(v)).map(([k, v]) => [k.trim().toLowerCase(), v]);' which assumes that headers are in the form of key-value pairs. If headers are not in this format, it will cause runtime errors.
Fix: Ensure that the headers are in the expected key-value pair format before processing them. Add a check to validate the format of headers.
Code suggestion
@@ -85,7 85,11 @@
const cleanHeaders = (headers) =>
- headers.filter(([_, v]) => !isEmpty(v)).map(([k, v]) => [k.trim().toLowerCase(), v]);
headers
.filter(header => Array.isArray(header) && header.length === 2 && typeof header[0] === 'string')
.filter(([_, v]) => !isEmpty(v))
.map(([k, v]) => [k.trim().toLowerCase(), v]);
const _queryHeaders = cleanHeaders(queryOptions.headers || []);
const queryHeaders = Object.fromEntries(_queryHeaders);
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
TooljetBot
reviewed
Jul 29, 2024
|
|
||
| return headers; | ||
| return { ...queryHeaders, ...sourceHeaders }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #1b4eb0 - 07/29/2024, 11:46 am
🔴 High importance
Issue: The merging of 'queryHeaders' and 'sourceHeaders' without validation or conflict resolution can lead to unintended overwrites or data loss if both objects contain the same keys.
Fix: Add validation to check for key conflicts between 'queryHeaders' and 'sourceHeaders' before merging. If conflicts are found, handle them appropriately, either by logging a warning, throwing an error, or deciding which value to keep.
Code suggestion
@@ -92,7 96,11 @@
- return headers;
const mergedHeaders = { ...queryHeaders, ...sourceHeaders };
const conflictingKeys = Object.keys(queryHeaders).filter(key => key in sourceHeaders);
if (conflictingKeys.length > 0) {
console.warn('Conflicting headers found: ${conflictingKeys.join(', ')}');
}
return mergedHeaders;
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
TooljetBot
reviewed
Jul 29, 2024
| return contentType === 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'; | ||
| export function checkIfContentTypeIsURLenc(headers: [string, string][] = []): boolean { | ||
| const contentType = headers.find(([key, _]) => key.toLowerCase() === 'content-type')?.[1]; | ||
| return contentType?.toLowerCase() === 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #1b4eb0 - 07/29/2024, 11:46 am
🔴 High importance
Issue: The use of 'toLowerCase()' on the content type string without checking if the string is defined could lead to runtime errors if the 'content-type' header is not present.
Fix: Add a check to ensure that the content type string is defined before calling 'toLowerCase()'.
Code suggestion
@@ -11,3 11,4 @@
const contentType = headers.find(([key, _]) => key.toLowerCase() === 'content-type')?.[1];
return contentType ? contentType.toLowerCase() === 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' : false;
- return contentType?.toLowerCase() === 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded';
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
TooljetBot
reviewed
Jul 29, 2024
| const contentType = objectHeaders['content-type'] ?? objectHeaders['Content-Type']; | ||
| return contentType === 'multipart/form-data'; | ||
| export function checkIfContentTypeIsMultipartFormData(headers: [string, string][] = []): boolean { | ||
| const contentType = headers.find(([key, _]) => key.toLowerCase() === 'content-type')?.[1]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bito Code Review Agent Run #1b4eb0 - 07/29/2024, 11:46 am
🔴 High importance
Issue: The change from using 'Object.fromEntries' to 'Array.find' can lead to performance degradation for large header arrays. Converting the array to an object allows for O(1) access time, whereas 'Array.find' has O(n) complexity. A similar issue was also found in plugins/packages/common/lib/oauth.ts (line 11).
Fix: Consider reverting to using 'Object.fromEntries' for converting the headers array to an object for faster access times.
Code suggestion
@@ -15,3 15,4 @@
const objectHeaders = Object.fromEntries(headers);
const contentType = objectHeaders['content-type'] ?? objectHeaders['Content-Type'];
return contentType?.toLowerCase().startsWith('multipart/form-data') ?? false;
- const contentType = headers.find(([key, _]) => key.toLowerCase() === 'content-type')?.[1];
- return contentType?.toLowerCase().startsWith('multipart/form-data') ?? false;
Is this a valid issue, or was it incorrectly flagged by the Agent?
- it was incorrectly flagged
adishM98
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
QA Checklist
Subpath Testing. (Automation/Smoke)Reverse Proxy/Reserve Proxy with Subpath. (Smoke)