Fixing accidental detection of require.js as common js #16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I changed to code to check for common js by looking for exports and module instead. Also, would it be possible to require fs inside the function where it's used?
redchair123
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2013
Fixing accidental detection of require.js as common js
|
@nathanathan I committed this but also dropped an email to the requirejs group to make sure that's the right technique |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I changed to code to check for common js by looking for exports and module instead. Also, would it be possible to require fs inside the function where it's used?