You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are many nice sampling features, but they are not always implemented consistently across methods.
Group sampling:
Currently works for Sobol and Morris. Is it possible to implement for other methods?
Nonuniform sampling:
Currently works for Sobol, with several others in progress Feature - non uniform sampling - DNM #192
The distributions are uniform, triangular, normal, and lognormal. Consider others? Maybe the option to pass any CDF function from scipy into the sampler. That could remove the confusing bounds parameter, where the parameters for the other distributions are not really bounds.
Building on the ideas in #234 , it might be possible to refactor these sampling features to avoid duplicate code and improve compatibility across methods.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are many nice sampling features, but they are not always implemented consistently across methods.
Group sampling:
Currently works for Sobol and Morris. Is it possible to implement for other methods?
Nonuniform sampling:
Currently works for Sobol, with several others in progress Feature - non uniform sampling - DNM #192
The distributions are uniform, triangular, normal, and lognormal. Consider others? Maybe the option to pass any CDF function from scipy into the sampler. That could remove the confusing
bounds
parameter, where the parameters for the other distributions are not really bounds.Building on the ideas in #234 , it might be possible to refactor these sampling features to avoid duplicate code and improve compatibility across methods.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: