You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
We just need to decide the notation for factors, firms and commodities.
Generally, firms/industries refer to the same set,
commodities/goods/intermediate inputs also refer to the same set.
But, following Hashimoto makes a lot of sense.
Thanks,
Dinar
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 3:29 PM Jason DeBacker ***@***.***> wrote:
@duncanhobbs <https://github.com/duncanhobbs> Making this notation
consistent would be very helpful.
j can be used for industry, which I think is the same as firm here -
there being only one firm per industry.
Following the notation in Hashimoto is a good idea.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#39?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJGNBOT4NQMHTEKCPXTJYUDQBNGALA5CNFSM4IHGHBK2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD25QE3Y#issuecomment-515572335>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJGNBORJ3RJVDNLG662XIZDQBNGALANCNFSM4IHGHBKQ>
.
I think files should use consistent notation and terminology across files to denote goods, firms and factors.
In
aggregates.py
,j
refers to both industries and goods in different equations. Buti
is also used to denote both goods and commodities.In
firms.py
,h
denotes factors of productionj
denotes goods andi
denotes both commodities and intermediate inputs.The Hashimoto book uses
i
to index goods,j
to index firms andh
to index factors.Is this the format we want to follow? I think it seems reasonable.
What notation do we want for industries? Currently we use
j
to refer to both firms and industries?I can work on cleaning and standardizing the notation if that would be helpful.
@jdebacker
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: