-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Plasma CAM: "Lead In" option #87
Comments
See also previous discussion here: I would say we can leverage the existing laseron / laseroff code from settings, to allow users to customise their firing sequence., because even on same firmware, the process is very much machine dependant: Here's a video of my machine (now sold with the move sadly) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZMn9tS2_II in action So the basic start stop of a plasma works like this: ###No Torch Height Control simple chinese inverter
Example: Start in center of hole, cut to radius, then complete circle CAM challenge: Algorithm to determine where to lead-in from (circles are easy = center) but such that its outside any other workpiece (always in scrap) 1.1 Note; May include a Z move to position it at optimal pierce height to start the arc
2.1 Once the arc is triggered, the HF pre-arc usually fires for less than a second or so, before the main arc starts. On the cheap machines (and since neither grbl or smoothie can talk to a THC yet to read the ARC OK signal) we just rely on a G4 dwell determined with a little trial and error (longer for thicker material) to allow the arc to pierce the metal 2.2 Once pierced (or sufficient time surpassed) usually machines without a drag torch, needs a Z move here, to bring the nozzle closer to the work (pierce height is around 5mm above surface with a 40A chinese plasma, and around 1mm for cutting)
|
So in LaserOn (we'll rename the field in settings to Tool On or something @jorgerobles we'll typically have
And in ToolOff
or if its a machine with a floating Z / drag torch
And in ToolOff
Since CAM can grab that from Settings, we can manage that with user specified or machine profiles Th only real dev work is the Lead-In (; |
Sheetcam does some extra cool lead in and also corner overshoot moves to improve quality even more |
http://torchmate.com/cad-cam-7-8-9/FAQs-Tool-Paths good read as well |
Should do I change the Laser On/Off label to Tool On/Off or also the variable name (gcodeLaserOn.. Off) ? if the later, just note it @tbfleming (I will replace also his files, of course) |
Well, we already have more milling operations than laser (; |
Sooo I went ahead anyways :D also transform gcodeToolOn to a TextArea, for any requirements to come |
Then also waterjet ;)
2016-12-18 15:36 GMT 01:00 Peter van der Walt <[email protected]>:
… I also went ahead and added PlasmaInside and PlasmaOutside to the
Operations Diagram
[image: plasma]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/7695323/21294197/1b7ddb48-c540-11e6-9edf-8f2cac076344.PNG>
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#87 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABoIYKHSk0KuyVOGLHku7F6L5K6x5hvrks5rJUT9gaJpZM4LQGfu>
.
|
Lol! WaterJet and Plasma pretty much are exactly the same - pierce time etc included |
I guessed that :D I suppose that diagram will suffice.
2016-12-18 15:38 GMT 01:00 Peter van der Walt <[email protected]>:
… Lol! WaterJet and Plasma pretty much are exactly the same - pierce time
etc included
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#87 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABoIYGbN6t98Hp2hRb5c92RJrRftZfRtks5rJUV9gaJpZM4LQGfu>
.
|
From those links, it looks like line lead in is better than curve lead in. Line lead in is also easier to implement. |
Agreed, line is fine. At the feedrate of consumer plasmas especially (the
industrial 300a units run at insane ipm's and the curve makes for less
vibration, but with a 40A hobbyist plasma you are running around 800mm/min
in 3mm mild steel
…On Dec 18, 2016 5:30 PM, "Todd Fleming" ***@***.***> wrote:
From those links, it looks like line lead in is better than curve lead in.
Line lead in is also easier to implement.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#87 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHVr2xYGQ4YgTIfQ40UrsnuRGIz-IgXaks5rJVGBgaJpZM4LQGfu>
.
|
keeping a eye on it ... |
Did this ever get implemented? In could not find plasma operations in current code base. |
Depents on if there is someone willing to implement it. The former cam dev has left the project. |
If only I had the ability to help it, But I am still very interest by this option ... |
A "Lead in" option would be very nice, for some tools like Plasma cutter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: