I think things should be made -betterC afterwards, when needed, and that it shouldn't govern our current efforts. -betterC is pretty drastic in its current form.

PR to amend the text you disagree with. I just want to get the state of the conversation recorded, since it seems contentious.

I'm also gonna say that, unless someone else decides to spend a reasonable amount of time on this, I'm gonna keep writing the code the way I have been ;) .. I have no motivation to write code that I can't use in my own projects.

It's not strictly betterC, it's just not making unnecessary use of Phobos, and not backing into a corner that it needs to be completely rewritten.

If there's a single API you're unhappy with because it supports betterC, can you point it out?

I'm just not interested in the result of this WG, because I've rewritten quite a lot of phobos for my own purpose, and it seems unlikely I will be able to use the image library (that was expected). I was expecting something much more minimalistic and D-ish. I think we disagree on how minimal things should be.

So, is this comment accurate? Discord discussion seems otherwise... maybe?

Well, no. I change mind very often.

So you will be interested in the result?

Yes.
From the very beginning I thought that "hell no", (because I'm not a fan of collegial anything) but I've written what I need here https://github.com/DlangGraphicsWG/documents/wiki/What-will-make-YOU-actually-use-reject-the-image-library? . If it improves measurably the performance of my products without much integration headache, why not use it?
(edit: so yes I "started" the effort with no intention to use the result, but well I guess everyone can change opinions)