-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create stacks caip19.md #68
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 1,60 @@ | ||
--- | ||
namespace-identifier: stacks-caip19 | ||
title: Stacks Namespace - Asset | ||
author: Friedger (@friedger) | ||
discussions-to: | ||
status: Draft | ||
type: Standard | ||
created: 2023-05-21 | ||
updated: 2023-05-21 | ||
requires: ["CAIP-2", "CAIP-10", "CAIP-19"] | ||
--- | ||
|
||
# CAIP-19 | ||
|
||
*For context, see the [CAIP-19][] specification.* | ||
|
||
## Rationale | ||
|
||
On Stacks, there are three types of native assets: STX, fungible tokens and non-fungible tokens. STX tokens are exposed to the users, | ||
the two others are only internal to smart contracts defined by the programming language Clarity. A Stacks smart contract can define | ||
more than one native fungible or non-fungible token to allow detailed control over assets. | ||
|
||
Smart contracts that contain only one fungible token, resp. one non-fungible token defines a Stacks fungible token (FT), | ||
resp. a Stacks non-fungible token (NFT). There are corresponding standards (SIP) exposing token functions to the user. | ||
|
||
|
||
## Syntax | ||
|
||
After the [CAIP-2][] (namespace chainID), a slash defines an `asset_namespace` and an `asset_reference`. | ||
The `asset_namespace` is defined via the SIP or | ||
|
||
| Reference | Equivalent to | See also | | ||
| :--- | :---- | :--- | | ||
| sip9 | ERC20 Token | | | ||
| sip10 | ERC721 | | | ||
| sip13 | ERC1155 | | | ||
| nft | | SC defining one native non-fungible token but not following sip9 standard | | ||
| ft | | SC defining one native fungible token but not following sip10 standard | | ||
|
||
|
||
## Examples | ||
|
||
``` | ||
# Stacks Mainnet NFT: | ||
stacks:1/sip9:SP3D6PV2ACBPEKYJTCMH7HEN02KP87QSP8KTEH335.megapont-space-agency/4 | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm sorry but I don't see any explanation of the |
||
|
||
# Stacks Mainnet xBTC | ||
stacks:1/sip10:SP3DX3H4FEYZJZ586MFBS25ZW3HZDMEW92260R2PR.Wrapped-Bitcoin | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The stacks/caip10 syntax is case-insensitive (or all-caps, to be more precise) which I assume is carried over from the Stacks native addressing system. Would it make sense or simplify things for this naming convention to match, to reduce the phishing/impersonation vector of i/I/l/L ambiguities, etc etc? |
||
``` | ||
|
||
## Links | ||
|
||
[CAIP-2]: https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/blob/master/CAIPs/caip-2.md | ||
[CAIP-10]: https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/blob/master/CAIPs/caip-10.md | ||
[CAIP-19]: https://github.com/ChainAgnostic/CAIPs/blob/master/CAIPs/caip-19.md | ||
|
||
|
||
## Copyright | ||
|
||
Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sentence fragment? perhaps a commit get left off the PR?