Quels sont les moyens efficaces d’améliorer vos compétences en géologie grâce à l’évaluation par les pairs ?

I have found that feedback from non-constructive peers that may even have disrespect for you, can be your secret weapon. The nature, content and exact point of their criticism might possibly be discarded altogether since irrelevant, but use it as a tracer that marks holes in your story! The specific point of your work they attacked or deconstructed might just be the weak spot in your analysis, or slightly poorer presented / visualised part of your results - so take the hint, tighten that piece of work up, turn it on the head, or perhaps drop it altogether because it distracted from your take home message! You don't have to say it out loud that they unintentionally have given you a leg up, just triumph...

it is absolute correct when you need to increase your ability your experience and modify yourself you have to choose good friend or good leader, i think seriously that the friend who print all good or bad things in your heart and feeling; in our study and field the geology is the art of possibilities and include a lot of variable and uncertinities; the people are having different capabilities and you must know the advantage and advantage for each to take the best from every person; to put in your consideration the reverence and respect are the key to achieve success and get all what you need from other. trustable; credible; well educated people who can help you as soon as you can.

If you believe in preserving a field of study, I would suggest walkabout. Yes get your eyes on the rocks and examine them carefully. Viz a viz, geology...now, if you come up with a new solution, the one, ultimate solution, once you can grasp that as intellectual property...you will commercialise the license rights. So what do I do? Yes, I'm in the field reverse engineering field studies in order to sub-license rights to the major competetive players...Hallelujah! Jump start the universal exploration. No psychologies needed :)

I totally agree, at some point in my career I switched from assuming everyone is on the same page what a peer review should do to simply start the review by outlining in a few bullet points what I want out of this review - including the level of iteration this work might already have been reviewed to give context and avoid getting out of hand.

The objective: good address and you should keep it in mind to achieve your goal as soon as possible and in short time. in the geology a lot of sub-branches under the same item; so you are request to set your goal and keep it clear as soon as you can to avoid all outside effects, in writing the geological reports advise you to put clear language and refer to the purpose you aime to. try to focus on the originality of the contents and the format should be unique, it is honest to refer to the sources which you quote from. make your thoughts sequential; create an organized index for evaluation. place all points and events are clearly refer to the goal you are talking about.

I would like to add here, don't forget the feedback is not criticism of your personality or you, it is supposed to detect the weaker spots and as a team help you lift the result up a level - to avoid external criticism when delivering/presenting and to make you appear your most professional self backed up by your peers

In my opinion, honest and constructive feedback based of on your evaluation criteria is the key in this process, encourage everyone to provide their observations and required improvement.

Openness to revise the work is key, don't be too rigid and fall in love with your work. There is always a room for improvement, so after thorough analysis and discussions of your peers team basically already done work can be more polished.

One of the biggest stumbling blocks is the inability to divorce you from your work. A critical appraisal of your work is NEVER an attack on you. It merely represents someone else’s opinion. Be grateful they were prepared to give one. You don’t have to agree, but try find out why they had those opinions. That knowledge alone is powerful.