Quelles sont les meilleures stratégies pour diriger une équipe dans le développement de systèmes ?

Also the acceptance criteria is key for the successful development. If all stakeholders are in an alignment to the acceptance criteria of the system use, it becomes much easier to follow and deliver successfully.

In addition, who's doing what early on. This helps set the tone. Discovery periods can get messy and they lead to messy planning periods too. Who's doing what, who's doing what when

Step 0: Nominate a decision maker. Usually a Product Manager or System Architect, this person is the decision maker for this development. Scope creep? Decision Maker right sizes the features. Too many goals? Decision Maker prioritizes. Can't agree on direction? You get it

Successfully leading a system development team involves a multifaceted approach that encompasses various strategies. Firstly, clearly defining project goals and breaking down tasks into manageable milestones lays the foundation. Building a diverse and skilled team, promoting effective communication, and fostering an innovative environment are essential elements. Prioritization, planning, and resource management ensure efficiency, while a positive team culture, effective delegation, and risk management contribute to a conducive working atmosphere. Continuous learning and adaptability, coupled with leadership by example, play a crucial role. Providing feedback, recognizing achievements, and collaborating with clients.

Define project scope and goals by clarifying system functions, user needs, and success metrics. Align with business objectives to foster a unified team vision and prevent issues.

Another aspect to consider is how the team’s system fits into the bigger systems across an organization. I have worked in organizations with teams that used different systems (such as waterfall and Agile). The coordination and alignment between teams can become complex. When looking at a single system, don’t forget about the adjacent and larger systems.

Select an apt methodology (e.g., waterfall, agile) based on project nature, size, and team dynamics. Tailor to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and stakeholder satisfaction in system development.

Have a greater understanding on upstream/downstream systems, what kind of dependencies exist, what methodology they use. Suppose Testing is done by another team, release/deployment is done by another team and support by another team. Apart from Methodology, also need to consider Tools, Technologies(Skills) that is needed for the system development. Identify all the stakeholders (Business, Product, Sales, Infrastructure/Operations, Architecture). Their involvement, availability would be key.

Besides the team and the stakeholders, be sure to inform others who need to know about your system development. By keeping them informed, they have a chance to tell you if any of your changes would affect them.

Besides the team and the stakeholders, be sure to inform others who need to know about your system development. By keeping them informed, they have a chance to tell you if any of your changes would affect them.

- Use a RACI chart to map out the stakeholders that need to be Informed (I) and Consulted (C) - Imagine what a great project comms plan looks like. Monthly updates, ship notifications and daily/weekly team standups. - Be clear who will do what, the ball drops when there is confusion on who is supposed to do what.

Foster effective communication and collaboration with the team and stakeholders. Establish clear channels and utilize tools for seamless interaction, ensuring understanding, feedback incorporation, and issue resolution. Build trust and alignment.

Empowering people, believing in people, brings confidence and nurturing of individuals and team connection, thus motivating amazing results.

In my experience motivation can be explicit and implicit. Explicit ones include Appreciation posts, a standing item on agenda, an award for good work at the end of the project. Implicit motivators include: - Assigning work people like. - Respecting work life balance. - Focusing on the impact of the work they are doing.

Here early plan on budget play a major role and kills the lead time. There should be a provision made well in advance for keeping a contingency budget for such inevitable changes and also to address any other Risk mitigation options.

One of the main aspects of systems development is the system intelligence . The systems intelligence is mainly through the continuous learning cycles leading to a continuous learning culture. The collaborative approach of reflecting upon success and trials is pillar to team and systems maturity. In the words of John Kaplan from google, celebrate failure leading to innovation across the value stream.

Stakeholders expectation management It's important to understand Stakeholders expectation, connect the perspective and create big picture. Whether it is investors, system & IT folks, end users etc., expectation has to be aligned for success of the program.

7. Accelerate, Tools Manage regular project health check. Look out for better ways of doing things. See what tools or automations can improve the productivity or other parameters to bring you more cushions into the project which can benefit into mitigating any sudden unexpected Risk.

Eu sou muito fã da tríade: Build, measure and learn. Quando aplicadas, além da melhoria contínua que por si só já traz foco e organização, mostra ao envolvidos onde queremos chegar, como e onde podemos melhorar como time (além de dar a oportunidade de discutirmos maneiras de fazer isso) e se estamos no caminho certo. Não considerar o histórico, como se as entregas fossem independentes, pra mim, é um desperdício de conhecimento valioso.