Jean Kluge

From Fanlore
(Redirected from Jean Kluge's)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fan
Name: Jean Kluge
Alias(es): jfkluge, M. Margaret O"Shea, Mary Margaret O"Shea
Type: fan artist, fan writer
Fandoms: The Sentinel, Star Trek: The Next Generation, The Professionals, Beauty and the Beast, Star Wars
Communities:
Other: Artwork by Jean Kluge
URL: jkluge at LiveJournal (offline)
Click here for related articles on Fanlore.

Jean Kluge is a well-known and highly praised fan artist.

Kluge also created art using the name M. Margaret O"Shea and Mary Margaret O"Shea.

She"s been active in many fandoms, but is probably best known for her artwork in Star Trek, Star Trek: The Next Generation, The Professionals, and The Sentinel.

Her art has been on the cover of many zines, sold as originals and prints at conventions, and later on the Internet, and recently, sold as t-shirt transfers. Her Star Trek: TNG illo, "The Quest," was used as the cover of the popular book, Textual Poachers.

Kluge is also a writer. Two of her most well-known zines, are the Sentinel novel, Changes.

She also wrote and illustrated (along with Marty Siegrist), the Star Trek: TNG Data/Tasha novel, Pulse of the Machine. Kluge included "Ensign Maggie O"Shea" (a red-haired, feisty baseball player) as one of the original characters that zine.

In 2017, Suzan Lovett credited Kluge"s influence on her own art and style:

[ Jean Kluge and I] lived close and we got to know each other. She was the one into a decorated borders and Celtic knot work. If it weren"t for her, I probably would never have gone into it. Watching her work on that, those things is what got me into it. We were always influencing one another all over the place.[1]

Awards

Con Guest

Kluge was a guest of honor at CONtinuum (1991).

Acafandom Book Covers

One of Kluge"s Star Trek: The Next Generation drawings is the cover of Textual Poachers, by Henry Jenkins.

In 1995, Jenkins told fans about how he"d wanted to get Kluge"s art on his book, Science Fiction Audiences: Watching Star Trek and Doctor Who, but got push back from his publisher. After finally agreeing to have her fanart on the cover, she had a month"s deadline to complete it. Kluge was so much in demand that this turn around was too tight.

Jenkins later commented that Kluge"s artwork "went up in value within the art hierarchy of fandom because it was associated with the book." He said:

There are T-shirts which have the cover of Textual Poachers on them which circulate in the fan economy, and the work of that artist, Jean Kluge, went up in value within the art hierarchy of fandom because it was associated with the book. She became a more valuable fan artist as a result of that. [2]

Profit and Value

During the 1980s and 90s, Kluge"s art, like Suzie Lovett and a few other artists, often went for hundreds of dollars at art auctions at conventions, leading to conversations about why it was considered wrong for fan writers and fan publishers to profit from their work, but all right for fannish artists to profit from their work. See letter of comment submitted to the The Hatstand Express on the topic.

In Jun 19, 2001 created the Yahoo!Groups to update fans about art for sale. [3]

Profit was also an issue in her 2009 "re-publication" of her Sentinel fanzine Changes in PDF form. More information about the discussion can be found at the "changes" zine here.

Kluge"s Description of Tangling With Agent With Style

In 2003, Kluge, along with many other fans, described her experiences dealing with Agent With Style, one of the biggest zine publishers and agents of the 1990s-2000s. From Dear Disreputable Zine Publisher:

... my dealings with Mysti Frank were, overall, a nightmare. Bootlegged zines, misrepresentation of her own inflated printing quotes as the *printer"s quotes", refusals to let me see the printer"s records/receipts, tacking on $5 to copies of my zine sold at cons (buyers informed me of this), trying to intimidate buyers who complained directly to me about problems with their copies of Changes or with receiving their orders, offering copies of the zine"s art as reparation for a problem with an order, later threatening to sell my pre-printed zine illos as art prints without my knowledge for her own profit when I was considering putting the story online due to anemic sales, under-reporting the number of Changes she printed and sold (our conservative estimate, calculated from the discrepancy in the number of copies of pre-printed illos remaining after Mysti returned the masters/illos to me -- a number that could not even remotely be attributed to mistakes by the printer, a printer who has never made any mistakes with the illos for Changes when doing the zine for *me* currently -- was approximately 65 copies). In order to get my master returned, I had to hold a commissioned piece of art hostage, then eventually deny Mysti all printing rights (which I always own on all of my work, including the cover of Textual Poachers) when she simply continued to deny any wrongdoing (as she seems to be doing now.) My own perception, after what I"ve experienced and seen, is that she lies constantly, bootlegs whenever she can get away with it (which is often), uses artists" work shamelessly (my own prints came back from her all sticky -- with what, I shudder to think, and another artist had her artwork returned damaged and written-upon -- when it was returned at all) -- something that makes me unquestioning of the many writers who"ve posted here regarding her changing their work without permission.

Quite simply, after my experiences, I don"t believe a single word she says, as I caught her in fabrication after fabrication.

[...]

Oh, did I mention she threatened to sue me when I wouldn"t cave? The things I"ve mentioned above are only a partial accounting, because, really, who has time for this shit? (I do still have all the tedious emails, though.) I *lived* through it once already. And giving out the info does little good -- people still buy her poor-quality (and frequently-shady) zines in droves, *knowing* full well (from first-hand accounts) how many people she"s cheated. But there"s a fraction of my experience, for all the good it will do.

Kluge"s Comments on Slash Fanworks

From Kluge in 1988:

Riker/Data art by Kluge: "Nothing So Strong" (unknown date)

From a fan in 2015: "I didn’t even know about slash until the mid-90s, when I saw a piece of Riker/Data kissing artwork from the great fan artist Jean Kluge from across the room I remember thinking *wow, Troi sure looks pale* … until I got up close to it.[4]"
Riker/Data art by Kluge: "Evolution" (unknown date)

Somebody"s actually gone and done it. I mean, I knew that somebody would — eventually. I was hoping for later rather than sooner. Someone wrote a slash Next Generation story ["Research/Development"]. (They can argue that it isn"t, but the semantics really make little difference.) And it"s excruciatingly awful.

Let me make my position clear on "/" fiction, to set the record straight. I like good slash fiction. I enjoy believable slash fiction. Those, however, are the two operative words — good and believable. K/S that involves one or the other character as a "love slave," or equally "alternate" permutations generally make me go, "Huh? Who are these people?"

I"ve also read slash fiction in numerous other fandoms, some of it wonderful, some of it in the Excruciatingly Awful category. So — I"m not against slash fiction, per se. I am, however, very much against badly written fiction, and this one fits the bill.

Picture this: a normal day on the new ENTERPRISE. Riker is making out his list of Things To Do. The laundry. Check on Engineering. Seduce Data. Huh?? Actually, to be fair (although certainly nobody warned me in advance, "sexually explicit" doesn"t cut it), that"s not quite how it goes. But it"s close... Who are these people? Riker and Data? I can"t think of an unlikelier combination. To make this one believable, it"d take a lot of doing, and I doubt that fandom"s best writers could pull it off. It just isn"t in the characters as we know them.[5]

Kluge"s Comments Fanart, Quality and Encouragement

In 1988, Kluge wrote about rejection, influence, and perseverance:

First, on the rejection of artwork. I am a firm believer in "no art is better than poor art." The problem is, I"ve seen a great many editors who talk a good line about rejecting artwork that is not up to par, but whose fanzines are littered with numerous examples of just what constitutes "not up to par." My own feelings on this are that most editors don"t have the time or energy to round up really spectacular art for every piece of prose that they decide to print, or that some of them just don"t recognize poor renderings when they see them. In that case, badly-drawn work is inevitable. There are also other sides to this issue. Take a look at some of Connie Faddis"s early works in old zines. Or Suzan Lovett"s. Or nearly any other artist whose work today is the kind of art that the rest of us attempt to emulate. Those early works may show only the faintest beginnings of the talent that was later brought forth through practice and a gradual improvement in technique. Without encouragement (and criticism) of fellow fans, some of these artists may never pursue their interest in drawing. It would be easy to say that any artist worth the paper she uses would presumably have the burning drive needed to keep practicing despite letters of rejection, but that is generally not the case. I still cringe when I see badly-rendered art work—but then I go back to some of the zines that printed my earlier works, and try to put what I"ve seen into perspective. It doesn"t make the bad art work any prettier, but it at least gives me a measure of tolerance toward the artist who may only now be learning. As I am. I just may happen to be further down the line.[5]

Kluge"s Comments on Her Fanfiction

[1977]: I don"t know the difference between a Good Story and Shit, except in how it makes me feel. I"m a terrific speller. That and grammar are my high points, as far as editorial skills are concerned. But I think I"m learning...[6]

Zines Containing Kluge"s Work

Appointment in Georgetown | Artforum | Changes | A Companion for My Death | Datazine | Destiny | Dr. Bellfriar"s Memorial Journal | Elusive Lover | Elusive Lover - Alternate Visions | Entr"Acte | Fantasia | Forever True | From a Certain Point of View | Galactic Discourse | Gentlemen Never Tell | Guardian | Psst... Hey Kid, Wanna Buy a Fanzine? | Idylls | Leave a Light On for Me | The Machiavelli Factor | Masiform D | Mind Meld | Missing Links | Motet | A New Hope | Pegasus | Powerplay | Pulse of the Machine | Rerun | Sanctuary | Sanctuary Moon | Sardonac | A Secret Place | The Sensual World | Shadowstar | Smarm | StarQuest | Subspace Chatter | The Road to Hell and Other Stories | The Sensual World | Smarm | Spinerisms | Treklink | The Wookiee Commode | Those Who Favor Fire | Threshold to Dreams | Variations on the Theme of B and D | Vault of Tomorrow | Vilya | You Could Use a Good Kiss

Gallery

See: Media Art Site,[7] Sentinel Art Page, Slash Art T-Shirts.

Beauty and the Beast

Blake"s 7

The Professionals

Simon and Simon

The Sentinel

Star Trek: TNG

Star Trek: TOS

Star Wars

Starsky & Hutch

Other

References

  1. ^ Media Fandom Oral History Project Interview with Suzan Lovett.
  2. ^ Intensities interviews Henry Jenkins @ Console-ing Passions, University of Bristol, July 7, 2001.
  3. ^ "This is an announcement list to notify you of changes to Jean Kluge"s website and when new art or special sales are available. This artwork is fandom related. SOME OF THE ARTWORK ON JEAN"S PAGE CONTAINS NUDITY." - jfkupdate · Jean Kluge"s Webpage Update List
  4. ^ "Fandom deplores a vacuum was fanfic any different in the Olden Days". 2015-01-19. Archived from the original on 2022-04-18.
  5. ^ comments to I (and Sharon) have been backed into a corner defending a single position over quality controls. Frankly, I rather resent this.
  6. ^ "Media Art". 2012-11-03. Archived from the original on 2022-04-18.
  7. ^ from a LOC in A Secret Place #5
  8. ^ from a LOC in A Secret Place #5
  9. ^ from Media Prints
  10. ^ from Media Prints
  11. ^ from aralias at Deadlier than the Male, Powerplay 4 and 5 (Jan. 24th, 2016)
  12. ^ from Helen Patrick
  13. ^ from Sarah Thompson at Hermit.org
  14. ^ from Media Prints
  15. ^ Editorial in the 1996/98 edition
  16. ^ from Media Prints
  17. ^ from The Professionals
  18. ^ from a mailing list, quoted anonymously (November 2020)
  19. ^ from The Professionals
  20. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  21. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  22. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  23. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  24. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  25. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  26. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  27. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  28. ^ from Sentinel Prints
  29. ^ from Media Prints
  30. ^ from Treklink #14
  31. ^ from Media Prints
  32. ^ from Where None Have Gone Before
  33. ^ from Datazine #57
  34. ^ from Art Forum #2
  35. ^ from Media Prints
  36. ^ from Media Prints
  37. ^ from Media Prints
  38. ^ quoted anonymously from Zinelist (Nov 30, 2010)
  39. ^ from Media Prints
  40. ^ from Media Prints
  41. ^ from Media Prints
  42. ^ from Media Prints
  43. ^ from Wanna Buy a Fanzine #5
  44. ^ from Media Prints
  45. ^ from Media Prints
  46. ^ from Media Prints
  47. ^ from Media Prints
  48. ^ from Media Prints
  49. ^ from Media Prints
  50. ^ from Media Prints
  51. ^ from Treklink #14
  52. ^ from Media Prints
  53. ^ from Datazine #43
  54. ^ from a LOC in "The Wookiee Commode]] #4
  55. ^ from a LOC in "The Wookiee Commode]] #4
  56. ^ a b c d e f from an LOC in The Wookiee Commode #6
  57. ^ from Psst... Hey Kid, Wanna Buy a Fanzine? #3. The reviewer gives it "3 trees." The reviewers in "Psst... Hey Kid, Wanna Buy a Fanzine?" rated zines on a 1-5 tree/star scale.
  58. ^ from Media Prints
  59. ^ from Strange Bedfellows (APA). #6
  60. ^ Artist"s Webpage, via Wayback Machine
  61. ^ from Media Prints
  62. ^ from Media Prints
  63. ^ from Media Prints