User talk:Overlordnat1

Welcome

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

• Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
• Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
• Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
• If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
• If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
• Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
• You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! Equinox ◑ 18:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

To-do list

I just had a basic crack at some of your list. Feel free to improve:

• book of prime entry
• cut along
• get out of it
• look in
• ozzie

Equinox ◑ 19:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Excellent job, especially finding quotes for ‘ozzie’. Thanks! Overlordnat1 (talk) 21:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Re "not much in it": is this the same "in" as "there might be something in that" (i.e. good idea)? Thus should be covered at "in" somehow? Equinox ◑ 10:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

That’s an interesting take on things. I was thinking about using ‘in it’ to refer to a difference in time or distance, such as ‘I nearly travelled as far as I did last time but there’s not much in it’ or ‘I nearly went as quickly as last time but there’s not much in it’ but if we take it to mean that the distance is unimportant then I suppose it is the same sense, as ‘there’s something in it’ means ‘there’s something important in it’. On the other hand you could replace ‘it’ with something like ‘what he’s saying’ in the sentence ‘there’s something in it’ but what could you replace ‘it’ with in the phrase ‘there’s not much in it’? ‘not much in it’ and ‘something in it’ both feel idiomatic rather than SOP to me but perhaps they could be dealt with by adding to the in or in it entries? Overlordnat1 (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Admin powers

Hey. Would you like to get admin powers? I can set up a vote for you GreyishWorm (talk) 12:01, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

It would be an honour to get such a promotion, as it were. If I did become an administrator, I’d behave consensually and responsibly. I hereby accept your offer. Overlordnat1 (talk) 12:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Awesome. Please accept at Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2022-11/User:Overlordnat1 for admin GreyishWorm (talk) 13:56, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

• Ah well, you probably won't quite make it. I'll do another nomination in a year or so (under a different username, naturally) Flackofnubs (talk) 12:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

macaroni

Can you change the first ===Etymology=== to ===Etymology 1=== and "nest" everything inside both etymology sections accordingly? Thanks! Amusingly, I noticed this not by seeing your edit, but by happening to be going through a semi-regular WT:TODO check for instances of "Etymology 2" without a preceding "Etymology 1", ha. - -sche (discuss) 18:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

-sche Done (I think). --Overlordnat1 (talk) 20:43, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

Ring ring goes the bell...

Grow up, this is not elementary school. This kind of edit summary ain't doing it.

Where did you get that from, that people calling for Israel to leave the occupied territories but still support its continued existence don’t normally consider themselves to be Zionist, nor are they usually considered to be such by others?

I mean, there are whole parties like Yesh Atid or Meretz which show reserves to further colonization the West Bank, yet still refer to themselves as Zionist. Shoshin000 (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

On top of that, just continuation of a Jewish state in Israel in its current territory or Israeli expansion is semantically redundant. There is no 'or'. Israeli expansion by itself implies the continuation of a state in the area. It's like saying "paying with money or cash". Shoshin000 (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

fairy chips

Hello Overlordnat1,

Does the entry that I created look accurate? mynewfiles (talk) 05:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Looks great thanks! Overlordnat1 (talk) 06:12, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you kindly. mynewfiles (talk) 06:21, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

to get someone at it

Hi, you seem a regular in the Tea Room. No one commented on my entry in the October tea room (the last entry, on "to get someone at it"). I'm English and I gave my understanding of this phrase based on my own use, but this is not in Wiktionary and most dictionaries don't have it. I mentioned an entry in the OED that might be connected, but I'm not 100% sure. Do you think Wiktionary should have an entry "to get someone at it" as a separate entry? 86.168.46.85 13:16, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I just read your comment and I don’t see why you shouldn’t create it, especially if you have supporting quotes. I’m unaware of the phrase myself but from what you wrote it looks like it can be a synonym of ‘put someone out’. Overlordnat1 (talk) 13:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I'll work out how to do that. 86.168.46.85 13:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Is my entry correctly done at https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/get_someone_at_it? I removed a reference to "gotten" as I believe it may be a UK-only phrase. 86.168.46.85 13:59, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

I've reformatted it with links to Google Books, collapsible quotations and links to conjugated forms of the phrase and to the Wikipedia page of the author. I might add Green's Dictionary of Slang as a reference too[1]. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 08:20, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. That's excellent. 86.164.110.86 18:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)