Talk:Denholm
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Msh210 in topic Denholm
Deletion debate
[edit]
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Tagged for speedy deletion, but I thought the general idea was that all place names should be included, so I don't see how "doesn't meet CFI" applies... maybe not the current CFI... eh. Discuss. (Also I'm in the include-all-place-names party, so I vote keep) — [ R·I·C ] opiaterein — 22:49, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Remember Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-05/Placenames with linguistic information 2? Needs a translation or something... --Yair rand (talk) 23:20, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete of course.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:02, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
- It meets the CFI now with a pronunciation and a surname definition. --Makaokalani 11:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
- Kept.—msh210℠ (talk) 16:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)