Jump to content

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pnatt (2nd)

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions. Been here a while now, and the socks appear to have died down. Create a new report when more come. Iolakana•T 16:08, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pnatt

[edit]

Several new socks of already indefblocked user:

See also Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pnatt.

Evidence
Virtually identical contribution patterns, consisting of adding nonsense, and changing spellings, on a specific selection of articles (including Shaun Micallef, The Micallef Program, and suburbs and localities of Melbourne). --bainer (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
All three have been blocked for 24 hours pending the outcome of any discussion and investigation here. --bainer (talk) 11:29, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The last two (38 and 39) are also blocked. --bainer (talk) 11:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've blocked 37 as well. He also vandalizes Rhotic and non-rhotic accents. User:Angr 12:25, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

36, 35, and 34 have also been blocked, the last two before they actually did anything. User:Angr 12:46, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto 33, 32, and 31. Isn't there a limit on the number of new accounts that a person can create per day? User:Angr 12:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I belive it is 10 per one IP address. What makes people suspect Minus 29 (one vandal edit, out of three) and Mcbgo XXVIII, who hasn't made any. Iolakana•T 13:22, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I identified Minus 29 because he/she made the exact same edits as the Pnatt sock/impersonator on 2 of the 3 pages and the third was a date conversion which is standard Pnatt behaviour. I presume Mcbgo XXVIII was identified because of the roman Numeral 28. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 13:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I see :-) Well, every one up to "Mcbgo @&" has been blocked. Iolakana•T 13:42, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Pnatt_(2nd)&oldid=1030671407"