Jump to content

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Hillock65

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.

User:Hillock65

[edit]
Suspected sockpuppeteer

Hillock65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

Suspected sockpuppets

Chuprynka (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)


Report submission by

Yarillastremenog 00:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence

Account created recently after User:Hillock65 had asked his useraccount be deleted, very similar to edit warring and accusing others of being 'xenophobic' and inciting hatred by accusing others of being Jewish

[1]: [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]

when told about the source of the screenshots in question (a war documentary) he accuses the uploader of being an avid porn fan [7]

Report by Betacommand

Block log (last 20):

Chuprynka

Hillock65


'Pages edited in common by' Hillock65 and Chuprynka:

Page: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian-German collaboration during World War II

Chuprynka

Hillock65

Page: Talk:Ukrainian-German collaboration during World War II

Chuprynka

Hillock65

Page: Ukrainian-German collaboration during World War II

Chuprynka

Hillock65

Page: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Chuprynka

Hillock65

Page: User talk:Yarillastremenog/Archive 2

Chuprynka

Hillock65

Response to report

[edit]

This report only shows that two users edited the same article. However, their behavior at the talk page was strikingly different. Chuprynka's comments were civil and reasonable. Hillock's were uncivil and defiant.

Additionally, Hillock has been notorious for POV-pushing and revert warring all over Wikipedia, while Chuprynka was not. There was no evidence that Hillock was anything more than a nationalist POV-pusher. This does not make him a socker per se. Further, the report was submitted by Yarillastremenog, a user now himself banned for sockmastering, as a retaliation for a sock-check submitted against him.

To summarize, no evidence whatsoever that Hillock is a sockmaster whatever disruptive his edits were. (I am not concenred with the fact of his block per se). Additionally, the edit patterns of the two editors are dissimilar enough to reject the match based on their edits alone. Their editing the same article does not prove sockpuppetry. I am here only to disprove false accusations. Hillock may stay banned for disruption, but he is no guilty for socking. Chuprynka has no reason to be blocked whatsoever. --Irpen 19:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusions

Upon review it was decided that there's no sockpuppetry here; both users unblocked. --Akhilleus (talk) 00:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Hillock65&oldid=1136432460"