Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jornalista68152/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jornalista68152

Jornalista68152 (talk  · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

19 November 2022

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Two newly created accounts whose only contributions went directly to the draft created by the puppeteer. Puppeteer also has only worked on the draft, see User contributions for Joãogomes1254. The socks: User contributions for Cdlviseu and User contributions for Imdbusa. Onel5969 TT me 11:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

11 September 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

New SPA, copypaste duplicate of EC-protected Draft:Arlyson Gomes at Draft:Arlyson Gomes (journalist). Wikishovel (talk) 08:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding User:Jornalismo124. Wikishovel (talk) 20:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 November 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Came to my talk page to complain about User:79a (a ptwiki admin) correctly tagging their Arlyzinho BR article as a recreation of this sockfarm's favorite target, Draft:Arlyson Gomes. I expect they're regretting that now. Courtesy ping GB fan, who they similarly contacted.

I suppose it's possible they just stumbled across this person's press releases about his newly self-published album and decided to make a draft and move it to mainspace over the objections of its afc reviewers, and I'm not familiar enough with this farm to block on the behavioral evidence alone. —Cryptic 23:46, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 December 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Yet another SPA working exclusively on a (fresh) promotional draft at Draft:Arlyson Gomes. The behavioral match is strong enough that I almost blocked without requesting an SPI, but there's enough recent sock activity that it would be nice to get a technical confirmation. signed, Rosguill talk 17:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and blocked on UPE grounds, as they continued promotional editing after having received a request for disclosure. signed, Rosguill talk 18:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

30 December 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

@User:Spicy --WikiBayer (talk) 14:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Spicy I don't have access to deleted elements in the enWiki so I can't link diffs. Here are Logs.

There are clear connections between the user Williampará in the enwiki and in many other projects.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=National_Artists_Club_of_Brazil https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=156979223
and in other Projekts example ([1] .....)
The user Special:Contributions/Taksoh17 was created at the same time as the other accounts in the enwiki. This had an edit in the simplewiki that makes it appear that this user is the same person. WikiBayer (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • I fixed the formatting of this case. WikiBayer:  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Spicy (talk) 14:33, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


12 June 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Behavioral evidence in the vein of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jornalista68152/Archive#22 December 2023: created an article on Arlyson Gomes at another mainspace title because base page name was salted for UPE. User's other page creation is a draft on Gomes' partner at Draft:Kaike Gabriel. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 11:43, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed some typos in my original statement. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 16:46, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Gabriel20299's edits on eswiki and wikidata also align with other socks. Please file g-lock request when closing here. DMacks (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ponyo CU-matched Gabriel20299 to Jornalista68152 and indef/tagged. I requested g-lock. Looking at their wikidata contributions, I see strong correlation of

with the same target pool. They are also blocked on enwiki, just pro-forma noting here that there is public behavioral evidence tying that IP to this pool via Gabriel20299. DMacks (talk) 02:45, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

02 July 2024

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Recreated Arlyson Gomes. Here we go again. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC) * Pppery * it has begun... 21:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Also:

who have not yet edited on enwiki (but are obvious sock looking at on-wiki behavior across several sites). DMacks (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I indef'ed Rosachat, nuked that account's remaining enwiki contribs that others had not yet done, and cleaned up both on commons. Global locks requested for that and JCPB. DMacks (talk) 03:52, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nothing left to do here, so closing. Note to DMacks once you've done everything that needs to be done, you can go ahead and close the case yourself. All cases get reviewed by a CU or clerk before archiving, so if you're not 100% sure of yourself, just close the case and leave a note for the archiver's attention if you feel the need. RoySmith (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Jornalista68152/Archive&oldid=1239791978"