Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 12

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 12

[edit]

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 12, 2024.

Terrokar Forest

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep only the correct spelling (verified by checking with Fandom). wbm1058 (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This specific zone is in fact mentioned at the target, though you'd have to check the spelling. Target is unlikely to be ambiguous, so keep. IznoPublic (talk) 02:45, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sara Landry

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was is now an article. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 04:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not exclusive to Mau5trap. Discussion warranted over abnormally high view counts for a music artist redirect. Jalen Barks (Woof) 23:26, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 20#List of Grand Theft Auto Advance characters

Untitled Kendrick Lamar album

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:29, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This album has been titled for a long time. I don’t see the purpose of having this anymore. Roasted (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Solitaire (solitaire)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:13, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary disambiguate, don't see how it'll be helpful to someone Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 04:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, keep or retarget to DAB?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cremastra (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. It's not being used to disambiguate in any articles and doesn't have a likely use. It is unlikely as a search phrase because the term already has disambiguating options without the recursion. czar 16:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't recursive; it's the same as Film (film), a film named "Film"; in this case Klondike has an alternative name "Solitaire" which is a type of solitaire game. -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 04:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ethan Herisse

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now star of Nickel Boys, among other credits. Nardog (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

HIALS

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. wbm1058 (talk) 22:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:38, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not added to the article yet.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 12:05, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:49, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeppesen from 1999 seems to disagree with you there; [7] indicates HIALS; so check your paper Jeppesen charts? This discussion on StackXchange [8] shows HIALS vs ALSF terminology -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relying on internet chat as our reliable source for building an authoritative encyclopedia doesn't instill a lot of confidence – I'm unfamiliar with this topic – wbm1058 (talk) 03:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your answer but I need to ask that to be sure about it, ALSF is the equivalent of HIALS and ALSF-II is the equivalent of HIALS-II? Am I right about that? – pilot162 Commented Jan 31, 2023 at 17:40

In the US I haven't seen a reference to "HAILS-II" so I am not sure. The FAA breaks approach lighting systems in "High Intensity Approach Lighting Systems" and "Medium Intensity Approach Lighting Systems." ALSF-2, ALSF-1, SSALR, SALS and SALSR are all considered "High Intensity" systems. MALS, MALSF, MALSR, SSALS, and SSALF are all medium intensity. – Max R Commented Jan 31, 2023 at 18:05

The ICAO system in Europe is trying to copy from the US FAA, but unfortunately many things are missing. Thank you very much for your answers. – pilot162 Commented Jan 31, 2023 at 18:16
Well Jeppesen is a reliable aviation source, it is an authoritative publisher of aeronatical charts, such as a terminal area chart (TAC) and approach plate which would contain such information. This print-out [9] someone apparently created in 2023 with Jeppesen charts of Cairo International (CAI/HECA) indicates HIALS lighting on the approach charts. -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 01:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:VRT permissions agents

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. Jay 💬 17:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These should ideally point at the same target. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

===VRT-permissions===
See also: Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team § User right (global)

Users in this group are a subset of Volunteer Response Team agents. These particular users have access to the permissions queues within VRTS and assist with copyright verifications. All users with permissions access will be in the global group.

Users are in this group for identification purposes and there are no special rights associated with it. Users who add or modify VRTS permissions templates without the vrt-permissions flag have their edits disallowed via edit filter 642.

===User right (global)===
See also: Wikipedia:Global rights policy § VRT-permissions
All editors with access to the VRT permissions and/or photosubmission queue are given the global VRT permissions agent user right. The user right itself includes only the permission to read pages (held by every IP and user account), access to the VRT wiki, and the ability to enable two-factor authentication. The user right exists for an edit filter which prevents non-VRT members from adding or removing VRT permission templates.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Semi-palindrome

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Anadrome mentions "semi-palindrome" as an "explanation" for the "semordnilap" entry, though that's not exactly helpful. As far as I understand, "anadrome" refers to single-word "semordnilaps" (or "semi-palindromes"), although the very first sentence of that article is tagged with {{cn}}. 1234qwer1234qwer4 03:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Google informs me that both semi- and half-palindromes refer to a word or phrase that, when spelled backwards, results in a DIFFERENT but valid word or phrase in the same language... with anadromes not really being the same thing. By this definition, semi/half-palindromes seem like a pretty cool concept, and one that might even be worthy of an article or subsection within the palindrome article... except that google ALSO informs me the semi-palindromes refer to a word in which only PART of the word is a palindrome, with another part having to be excluded to make the palindrome work... "semordnilaps" (with the s on the end) would be an example thereof, since the final "s" must be excluded to make the anadrome work. This would ALSO be a worthy mention in the palindrome article... if we could find a good solid WP:RS to cite it. All the sources I just found are insufficiently reliable, and of course, are divided between which definition they use. Fieari (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I came back to this, trying to find a reliable source, and basically just ended up finding enough attestations of the word in both definitions (and one more definition besides!) to be able to add it to wiktionary: wikt:semi-palindrome. It might actually just be best to crosswiki to this wiktionary definition instead, since there seems to be no overall consensus of what a semi-palindrome is that we could add to the palindrome article. Fieari (talk) 06:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not mentioned at target, likely don't have any reliable sources about them. If anyone can find reliable sources and put them in the palindrome article, then keep - but until then this redirect creates the impression that "semipalindromes" are something wikipedia documents, which we don't. BugGhost🦗👻 21:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of cities in Clipperton Island

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clippterton island has no cities. It is an uninhabited island. The linked section has no list of settlements. Delete. -1ctinus📝🗨 17:39, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tagging me - I agree the topic itself doesn't exist, but to briefly explain my rationale behind creating it, there is an Template:Oceania topic "List of Cities in Oceania" which automatically populates itself with a redlink to 'List of Cities in Clipperton Island'. I wanted a way to avoid this redlink automatically appearing on dozens of pages in the template, and because I know very little about editing templates I didn't know how to exclude Clipperton Island from the list. Instead I created the redirect to the closest extant topic I could find. I'd note that Clipperton Island was formerly inhabited, and the section of the Clipperton Island page dealing with the history of these various settlements seems to be like the most helpful topic to redirect someone to if they were looking for this information (perhaps I should have linked to a different section of the page to achieve this). I'm happy if the decision is to delete the page but would request someone who knows more about templates finds a way to exclude Clipperton Island from the 'List of Cities in Oceania' template. GeorgmentO (talk) 23:05, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I could not figure out myself. Delete if we can figure it out. I've asked at Template talk:Oceania topic#Avoiding entries in derived templates. Jay 💬 18:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Useful redirect, per Georgmen0 above. I think modifying said template would be significantly more work and effort than just keeping this template in place, and it does point to the nearest concept... and would explain the lack of cities to anyone clicking on the link. Fieari (talk) 07:19, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Clipperton Island#Politics and government does not explain the lack of cities. The section doesn't even imply that the island is uninhabited... -- Tavix (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:48, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Niggling

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Google Search found me pages and pages of dictionary definitions. Wikipedia search found the most common usage is niggling injuries experienced by athletes. wbm1058 (talk) 09:14, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant redirect. Niggling is a form of the verb "niggle", but in the target page, "Niggle" is the name of a character. Batrachoseps (talk) 18:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:46, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong delete. Not mentioned at the target, and there's no apparent reason why it would redirect here. Just because Tolkien used the word in a letter once to describe himself doesn't mean that this should redirect to a book that has a character whose name is an alternate version of the word. This violates WP:PLA and inhibits searching within Wikipedia, as we see dozens (maybe hundreds) of other articles where the term is used, none of which should be redirected to either. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 16:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Demonstation

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Demonstration. Liz Read! Talk! 18:38, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be a typo of "demonstration", which is distinct from "protest" (the former is broader). However, demonstration is a dab. Maybe retarget there? Duckmather (talk) 02:06, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete? Retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:45, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to DAB page. I oppose the idea that the radio station is relevant - "demon station" is not the name of the radio station, and does not even exist as a redirect to it. BugGhost🦗👻 21:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget per above; this (for once) appears to be a very common misspelling of "demonstration" with over 300,000 hits on Google. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Notional-functional syllabus

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Notional-functional syllabus

Esyllabus

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Esyllabus

Priestess of the Moon

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Priestess of the Moon

OoX

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect if the intent is to refer to a game in the The Legend of Zelda series with "X" referring to a letter wild card (for this target, the respective acronyms would be "OoA" and "OoS"): This redirect could also refer to The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, which is "OoT". Steel1943 (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

results gave me... birbs and madness combat. delete cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 15:58, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, possibly with a hatnote. My results are a roughly equal mix of Zelda (with the term used to refer to the two titles collectively), World of Warcraft ("OOX refers to a series of mechanical chickens created by Oglethorpe Obnoticus" which might as well be written in Greek for all it means to me) and random non-notable stuff. List of airports in Ukraine#Military bases tells me OOX is the IATA code for Melitopol Air Base but that isn't mentioned in the article. I can't find any mention of the WoW meaning on Wikipedia (but someone who understands the game should check that) but the collective term for the Zelda games should be. A hatnote to the air base (and WoW if mentioned) would seem to be useful but I'm not going to lose any sleep if others disagree with that. Thryduulf (talk) 18:13, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So ... an ambiguous redirect with no connection to either subject at its current target should ... remain with a hatnote placed at the current target? Seems nonsensical. What would make more sense would be to create a disambiguation page and deregulate the current target to a "See also" section. (I'm still in the "delete" camp, but "disambiguate" makes more sense than "keep and hatnote" here since the "keep" part just doesn't make sense.) And I'm just itching to cite WP:PANDORA and claim this opens the door for other wildcard redirects ... maybe XBC (I know there's already an article there) for ABC, NBC, etc? Steel1943 (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Extremely ambiguous with no primary topic. Let the readers type up a more specific search term or let the search function do its job. Ca talk to me! 04:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Steel1943: an ambiguous redirect with no connection to either subject at its current target the redirect refers collectively to both of the games the target article is about. That's very much not "no connection to either subject". When something is ambiguous between one notable and multiple non-notable things, or where only one of the things is mentioned on Wikipedia, then redirecting to the only place we have relevant content is normal and more helpful to readers than deletion. Here the term refers to exactly three notable things, one of which is very clearly not the primary topic (the airbase) and two things which could be primary (Zelda and WoW). However we only have content about one of the latter two (Zelda) so we should redirect there. I don't object to a dab page, but Zelda would be a full entry not a see also. Thryduulf (talk) 10:52, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    even if wikipedia had those wild cards for disambiguating (like xrt and eox being dabs for the first two five pokémon mystery dungeon games), this redirect could refer to 3 games in a single franchise, with a disambiguator that isn't even popularly used to refer to any of them in the first place. this redirect would require leaps of logic and frivolous details bordering on gamefaqs-style fancruft to keep or dabify... for the most part, anyway. i won't argue for or against the air base cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Except it is commonly used to refer to the games collectively. I have no knowledge about whether the Pokemon games are referred to collectively at all/in that manner, but if they are then they should be included on the relevant dab pages. Windows 3.x is not used to refer to any operating system specifically but it is used to refer to them collectively so we have a disambiguation page. Thryduulf (talk) 17:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    a more thorough look into the results gave me... just as little association with tloz as before. one result among a myriad of mechanical birds and... instagram usernames probably proves that usage of this wild card is too niche for wikipedia at best cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 19:35, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nominator vote update: super weak retarget to Melitopol Air Base. I verified "OOX" was the IATA code for Melitopol Air Base, and added the code to the article, as well as created the respective redirect OOX pointing towards Melitopol Air Base. However, I still prefer deletion since IATA codes are in all caps always. (Other than that, I believe I have already made my other relevant points in this discussion and am refraining from further participating in order to avoid performing a WP:BLUDGEON.) Steel1943 (talk) 17:57, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Never mind on all that: Seems the connection between "OOX" and Melitopol Air Base is potential WP:OR per an edit that reverted something I did. Forget that then. (Still "delete" on this redirect.) Steel1943 (talk) 20:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:56, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:40, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Adam Angligena

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Adam Angligena

Undermine (Warcraft)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 6#Undermine (Warcraft)

Nerubian

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Nerubian

Ringie

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Longtail (rat). (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 15:15, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slang term not described at target but listed at Longtail (rat) (which is somehow not linked from the Rat article). There appears to be an unrelated meaning at Two-up, though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:42, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Longtail (rat) per nom. No other mention elsewhere. BugGhost🦗👻 21:49, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Ǝ́

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ə is a different letter from Ǝ, but neither article mentions this diacriticised character. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:27, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Karorius

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Karorius

Aušautas

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Aušautas

Aušlavis

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Aušlavis

Diedievaite

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Diedievaite

Feminist Perspectives on Eating Disorders

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Feminist Perspectives on Eating Disorders

Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 20#Runswick Bay Lifeboat Station

Hispanized Southeast Asia

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 22#Hispanized Southeast Asia

Warcraft: Anthology Vol. 1

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:26, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target * Pppery * it has begun... 00:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Warcraft#Manga per commentary at #Warcraft: Legends. IznoPublic (talk) 02:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...The redirect is not mentioned at Warcraft#Manga though. Looking through the page a bit, I don't see how anyone looking up this term could refer to any specific subject on that page. Steel1943 (talk) 20:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the current and proposed targets.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 18:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Whoopsie daisy

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5#Whoopsie daisy

Fever with rash

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No mention of rashes at target; might be retargeted to Rash instead. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - combining two topics together, ambigious where it is intended to go and we don't have an article on them as a pair. BugGhost🦗👻 08:47, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per BugGhost. The NHS tells me this can be a symptom of multiple conditions including scarlet fever, chickenpox, and roseola. Thryduulf (talk) 10:59, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Subfebrile

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Subfebrile

Phever

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to PhEVER. R from miscap. (non-admin closure) Utopes (talk / cont) 04:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely misspelling; meanwhile there is PhEVER and a producer by the name of Phil Phever mentioned in a few articles. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:34, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2025 NCAA Division I FCS football season

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 14:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target and provides no information relevant to the title. Redirect is misleading as a result and is better left as a redlink for the time being. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Super Emeralds

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 07:16, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The target article contains information about "Chaos emeralds" and "Master emerald" ... but nothing about a "Super emerald". Readers trying to find information about this topic will find nothing at the target. Steel1943 (talk) 00:54, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:47, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

DcVD

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#DcVD

Simpsons

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

'Simpsons' can either refer to the show 'The Simpsons' without the word 'The', or as a plural of the surname 'Simpson'. PK2 (talk; contributions) 03:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cranberry Station

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Cranberry Station

Cow neck

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 20#Cow neck

Oc county

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 20#Oc county

God of the Old Testament

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#God of the Old Testament

Santa Maria Beach

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Santa Maria Beach

Back O' Beyond

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Back O' Beyond

List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#List of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas characters

Jizzy B.

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Jizzy B.

Ran Fa Li

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Ran Fa Li

Vinewood

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to refer to what is mentioned at List_of_fictional_settlements#Video_games, though there is also Vinewood (Detroit), James R. DeBow House, and an entry at National Register of Historic Places listings in Coweta County, Georgia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Cluckin' bell

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. How many redirects point to this article? Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just did a count, there are still 93 existing redirects to this article. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Occurs twice in passing at Grand Theft Auto Online, and as a soundtrack at Soundtracks of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:31, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Yellow Bell Station

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:46, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:27, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Market Station

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:11, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, and way too vague to be appropriate. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:14, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Jimmy Hernandez

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Jimmy Hernandez

Four Dragons Casino

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:10, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Zero (Grand Theft Auto)

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 19#Zero (Grand Theft Auto)

Red County, San Andreas

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:08, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to appear anywhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:02, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_12&oldid=1249692524"