Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 July 27

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 27, 2018.

Airship (video game)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 07:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading redirect that would suggest a video game name. Unnecessary. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:41, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Laval Mills

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Amory (utc) 15:59, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Created by user that was blocked for vandalism. Not mentioned in target page. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 16:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mary Bowes-Lion

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 August 3#Mary Bowes-Lion

Ghazwatul Hind

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy close. Bad-faith nomination by a banned editor. Since nobody has commented in favour of overwriting the redirect who is not obviously a sockpuppet of the banned editor, I'm closing this. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:54, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the history and comparing the last version I believe, the article may be given a separate page and redirect removed (and protected from disruptions, as is clear from history). This article is already available in other languages on official wikipedia:

So why the updated English wiki article (which is more comprehensive, well sourced and neutral) is muted using a redirect? (Note: The article was marked for deletion in March 2014 for being brief and unsourced, and some users quote that to keep it on redirect. But now those issues have been addressed in the July 2018 version of the article.Even placing a protection template request on talk page of Ghazwatul_Hind is undone by some users!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:205:10c:9c91:284c:dcfc:8851:3177 (talkcontribs) 15:14, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bham

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 07:17, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget or dabify? Most search results are for Birmingham or Birmingham, Alabama. feminist (talk) 11:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shomer Fucking Shabbos

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Great line though ~ Amory (utc) 15:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unused redirect based on trivial movie quote. Ibadibam (talk) 03:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.