Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 May 9
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
May 9
[edit]Press Information Bureau of the Government of India images
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete all. After Midnight 0001 10:54, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MukulWasnik.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:PawanKumarBansal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:SalmanKhurshid.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:KantilalBhuria.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MuthuvelKarunanidhiAlagiri.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:ShriprakashJaiswal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:AjayMaken.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:SubodhKantSahay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MamataBanerjeePBI-2-cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:PrafulPatel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:KumariSelja.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:BijoyKrishnaHandique.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:KrishnaTirath.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:SaugataRoy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:SharadPawar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:VirbhadraSingh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:FarooqAbdullah.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:VeerappaMoily.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:VayalarRavi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:DayanidhiMaran.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MamataBanerjeePBI-5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MamataBanerjeePBI-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MamataBanerjeePBI-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MamataBanerjeePBI-4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:MamataBanerjeePBI-5-cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:VirbhadraSingh-cropped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Licensing of the Press Information Bureau of the Government of India authorizes reproduction without permission, but requires that “the material must be reproduced accurately”. Files uploaded to Wikipedia must be licensed for modification. Undoubtedly, these images were uploaded in good faith, but I do not believe that this licensing is compatible with our requirements. Several of them have been modified already: File:MamataBanerjeePBI-5-cropped.jpg, File:MamataBanerjeePBI-2-cropped.jpg and File:VirbhadraSingh-cropped.jpg are crops. (A contributor at ANI raised concerns that these might be third-party images hosted by the PIB, in which case they are not licensed by the PIB at all, but it is my feeling that this is immaterial, given the innate license incompatibility.) Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The images I uploaded are of Cabinet Ministers, the highest rank of a minister in India. They are in cream of all politicians and I believe they do deserve a photo on Wikipedia. If derivations are not allowed I believe, only 3 images should be deleted, not all. Further, I believe we can use modifications as long as it is not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context, as said in the statement. GaneshBhakt (talk) 08:33, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand that these are important people, and certainly they do deserve a photo on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, that's not really the deciding factor in determining if content is free for our use. What the license says, specifically, is "The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." Note that these are two clauses separated by an "and", which means that both conditions must be fulfilled. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I came here to see why the pictures had been deleted. I agree with user:Moonriddengirl assessment - the license being offered by the Indian government is not compatible with Wikipedia's requirements. In particular, the Indian governments' insistence that the pictures never be used for anything which could be considered derogatory is incongruent with Wikipedia ideas. Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand that these are important people, and certainly they do deserve a photo on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, that's not really the deciding factor in determining if content is free for our use. What the license says, specifically, is "The material must be reproduced accurately and not used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context." Note that these are two clauses separated by an "and", which means that both conditions must be fulfilled. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:37, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Szostalo- At Long-Last.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Picture of sculpture by Wiktor Szostalo 2006 Ronhjones (Talk) 00:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Szostalo-At Long Last.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Picture of sculpture by Wiktor Szostalo 2006 Ronhjones (Talk) 00:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Szostalo-Dying Prophet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Picture of sculpture by Wiktor Szostalo 2006 Ronhjones (Talk) 00:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Szostalo-Dying Prophet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Picture of sculpture by Wiktor Szostalo 1991 Ronhjones (Talk) 00:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Picture of sculpture by Wiktor Szostalo 1999 Ronhjones (Talk) 00:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Picture of sculpture by Wiktor Szostalo 2001 Ronhjones (Talk) 00:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Picture of painting by Wiktor Szostalo 1989 Ronhjones (Talk) 00:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DEVILFISH paperback 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: there is no evidence that Penguin books has given their consent to freely licence this image as claimed by the uploader. Besides which, the fair -use claim contradicts the free licence but if it is not free then it cannot be used in the infobox of the author but only in the infobox of an article about the book itself under a fair-use claim. ww2censor (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- a photo probably from 1957. Too young for PD (the current license tag is wrong without a source/author). Was in use in a book from 1987. Saibo (Δ) 16:40, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- a photo probably from 1965. Too young for PD (the current license tag is wrong without a source/author). Was in use in a book from 1987. Saibo (Δ) 16:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- a photo probably from 1971. Too young for PD (the current license tag is wrong without a source/author). Was in use in a book from 1987. Saibo (Δ) 16:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:05, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:McTigue Training.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- apparently a newspaper clipping. Too young for PD-old-70 (if it is an Irish photographer). Saibo (Δ) 16:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, file retagged. After Midnight 0001 02:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JIAdedpgm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of a pamphlet cover from 1965, tagged as "own work", probably in error. It seems the uploader meant to say they took the photograph, but it seems inherently unlikely they are the author of the pamphlet (or of the image printed on the pamphlet, for that matter). Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight 0001 02:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Burson-marsteller Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No source is listed. Banaticus (talk) 23:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Do we require source (other than the name of the company) for a fair use company logo? --InfantGorilla (talk) 07:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- From WP:PUF "Files that are tagged with a non-free template should not be listed here." --InfantGorilla (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Do we require source (other than the name of the company) for a fair use company logo? --InfantGorilla (talk) 07:00, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.