Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Beautiful Dreamer 888

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. —Doug Bell ^talk 02:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beautiful Dreamer 888

User is not active other than on user page. Wikipedia is not myspace The18thDoctor 23:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as this account was only created on January 30. Excluding my very first edit, my next 30-35 edits were all to my userpage, and I didn't make another edit until five days after that! Please don't bite the newcomers! − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 00:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also concerned about this user in particular because they claimed in a previous edit to be 10 years old... with them not registering to edit, other than their userpage I thought it might be best as a precaution to remove a myspace style user page. Unsure of the policy that would relate to this, if there is one. The18thDoctor 02:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Give a notice/warning. A block and deletion would be rather harsh, and would be pretty close to biting. Give them another chance, but if all else fails, delete. bibliomaniac 1 5 05:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the time being, but come back in a month's or so's time if the user has made no encyclopedic contributions. MER-C 11:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and watch per User:MER-C. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 18:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and leave alone. Sheesh. Zocky | picture popups 01:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, certainly for now - The policy says User pages are only in connection with "working on" the encyclopedia, which arguably falls short of saying you must be editing. The page itself is short & inoffensive (so far) & she (?) is so far declaredly a reader/user only of the mainspace. One could imagine a reader's user page (not this one) that had constructive comments etc - would that be caught by WP:NOT? No, I'd guess. Anyway, don't bite the newbies - better practise here than on articles. Johnbod 19:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ inactive user, probably already left wikipedia or created another account. After looking at rules more thoroughly I decided change to Neutral, but I can predict it's going to be kept anyhow per WP:SNOWBALL. Wooyi 20:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know they're ianctive? Their last edit was one week ago! (btw, the inactivity might have something to do with the newbie biting that's going on on this page.) Zocky | picture popups 13:48, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A talk page warning is not the same thing as an MfD. EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.