Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 April 23

< April 22	April 24 >

April 23

File:KingCrimson VinegarDoppio 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This file is not in the public domain, as the source was written in the 1990s by a currently (as of nominating) living person. In addition, the file is unused and will not see use for a long time as character lists do not use images for each character. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 00:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rosebride3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: does not add educational, critical value but is a decorative image. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bibhorr-formula.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. MBisanz ^talk 20:09, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious "formula" with no use in real-world mathematics (despite its inventor spamming it all over the Internet to boost his ego); see [1] Equinox ◑ 19:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused image with no likelihood of usage in the future given Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bibhorr formula. -- Whpq (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, corresponding article was deleted, no use for this. Natureium (talk) 15:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Xi Jinping Poohbear comparison meme.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Yamla (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image that is not essential to the understanding of the topic. The censorship incident is a minor indecent. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Whpq (talk) 21:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It does help illustrate the meme, which text alone has difficulty conveying. weak keep Abzeronow (talk) 22:22, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The meme is a minor matter in the biography. At the time of nomination, there is literally a single sentence about Xi being compared to Pooh, and no actual commentary about the image itself. That really falls well short of the significant context that would be expected to support the inclusion of a non-free image. -- Whpq (talk) 01:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The meme is a significant example of ChiCom censorship surrounding matters deemed disrespectful or irreverent to Xi Jinping. As Abzeronow said it's difficult to convey via text only and I have included this on other articles pertaining to PRC censorship. EverettTheUrban (talk) 07:04, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - according to Template:Non-free film screenshot, the only explicitly allowed fair use of screenshots from a copyrighted film is "for critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents", and its current usage to illustrate an internet meme or censorship is not covered by that rationale. There are plenty of freely licensed images for Xi Jinping, and as far as Chinese censorship is concerned, the Winnie the Pooh incident is extremely minor. The blocking of Google and Facebook etc. is of far more consequence. -Zanhe (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The image is now also in use at Internet censorship in China, Winnie-the-Pooh, and Winnie the Pooh (Disney character). There is no separate rationale provided for usage in each of these articles, and as such fails WP:NFCC#10c. The uploader was notified of the need for rationales for use but ignored the notice. -- Whpq (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Update the uploader EverettTheUrban has been blocked for sockpupettry. -Zanhe (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.