Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 November 29
November 29
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 4.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 5.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 6.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 7.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA 8.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided Skier Dude (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA C.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided - easily replaceable by text Skier Dude (talk) 04:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MANGRAL SHAJARA D.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rajafiaz (notify | contribs).
- OR, no encyc use or target article provided - easily replaceable by text Skier Dude (talk) 04:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Beeblebrox (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Theenddeluxe.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MatthewWaller (notify | contribs).
- This file fails to meet our WP:NFCC policy. Specifically, it does not meet point three, section a as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This file is not significantly different from the main cover to justify its use; the only difference between this alternate album cover from the main album cover is color. — ξxplicit 06:56, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - and it fails WP:NFCC#1 coz it's replaceable with text describing the colour, WP:NFCC#8 coz reader's are not going to lack understanding by inability to see two different colour covers, and WP:NFCC#10c because the rationale is the usual cookie-cutter album cover one that is simply wrong for this (secondary) image. Unfortunately there are probably over 1000 images in the same position. - Peripitus (Talk) 10:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AREA-ENGLISH-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eyesonchrist (notify | contribs).
- Magazine cover in biographical article without significant justification. It is basically decorative and does not significantly add to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:NYLON-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eyesonchrist (notify | contribs).
- Magazine cover in biographical article without significant justification. It is basically decorative and does not significantly add to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AERA-ENGLISH-with Krystal-Meyers-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eyesonchrist (notify | contribs).
- Magazine cover in biographical article without significant justification. It is basically decorative and does not significantly add to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BOUNCE-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eyesonchrist (notify | contribs).
- Magazine cover in biographical article without significant justification. It is basically decorative and does not significantly add to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:27, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uniqlo-with-Krystal-Meyers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eyesonchrist (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image used simply to show Krystal Meyers does modelling ... I think . No useful rationale for use and the image does not signficantly add to reader's undertstanding - fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Alextrebek86.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PsychoJason (notify | contribs).
- Fair-use of a living person; adds nothing to the Jeopardy! article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:03, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Krystal-Meyers-Make-Some-NoiseMusic-Video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eyesonchrist (notify | contribs).
- Simply decorative non-free image - even the image page states "To show her as the talented beauty that she is in her video". Does not significantly add to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 20:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - The image is a derivative of a copyrighted work and so must meet the non-free content criteria to be kept; the copyright belongs to the original creator of the art this was derived from, also to the artist who created the derivative and lastly to the creator of this photograph. I am reading the result of the debate that while the image illustrates something associated with the game, it does not (as required by the criteria) significantly increase reader's understanding - Peripitus (Talk) 02:40, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Metalslugairbrush.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Beeblebrox (notify | contribs).
- I think this image qualifies as "derivative work" due to it being fanart rather than official art. See [1]. Images like this aren't free use. Also, it really has no purpose in this article that a gameplay screenshot couldn't show. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This image is of my own personal property. Yes, I have an arcade machine in my house. I don't know what policies we have specifically dealing with "fan art" but the image belongs to me, and I have released under terms consistent with Wikipedia licensing. The purpose in adding it to the article (which I'm not certain is really relevant here) was to demonstrate the cult following this game series has achieved with NeoGeo fans. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I had a look at the link in the nomination, and it's just a conversation on this subject, not a policy or even a guideline. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Neogeofullon.JPG shows the entire machine and a corner of my cluttered kitchen, in case anyone doubts it's really mine. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:20, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I had a look at the link in the nomination, and it's just a conversation on this subject, not a policy or even a guideline. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The thing is, owning an object with an image on it does not mean you have license to reproduce that image. A photograph of a copyrighted picture, even on the side of something you own, is a derivative work of a copyrighted work and thus is subject to the same copyright. It would need to be in line with our Non-free content criteria to be used. I have no idea what "fan art" vs "official art" has to do with anything though, either way there is a copyright implied that is not likely compatible with our free content. Chillum 23:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm honestly not sure about this, I am going to relate the entire story for clarification. This machine used to be here. It got old, half the buttons weren't working, and there were cigarette burns on the keypad. The local vending machine guy sold it to a friend of mine. This friend overhauled the machine, replacing the buttons and the screen, and sent they keypad off to an airbrush artist to do a custom paint job on it. Later, this friend needed some cash, and some extra space in his house because was soon going to be a father, so he sold the machine to me. Since he commissioned an original work of art, and then sold it, I figure that means it is mine. However since it is obviously based on characters and weapons from the game, uh, well, uh, crap I just don't know what it's fair use/copyright status might be. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The thing is, owning an object with an image on it does not mean you have license to reproduce that image. A photograph of a copyrighted picture, even on the side of something you own, is a derivative work of a copyrighted work and thus is subject to the same copyright. It would need to be in line with our Non-free content criteria to be used. I have no idea what "fan art" vs "official art" has to do with anything though, either way there is a copyright implied that is not likely compatible with our free content. Chillum 23:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh... Well if it was indeed a work for hire then the copyright would go to the person who hired the artist, and if that person gave it to you then the only issues would be the reproduction of the actual characters and weapons of the game. I think it becomes a bit subjective at that point, and it is a bit outside of my knowledge. Chillum 05:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, it doesn't look like the copyright lawyers are watching this page right now. How long do we wait for them to show up and resolve this? Beeblebrox (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Lol. I have participated so I will not be closing this, and I don't really know how long they go. If I did close it I would have a very tough time seeing any sort of consensus for deletion though. Chillum (Need help? Ask me) 01:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a derivative work but more importantly it's entirely gratuitous in the article. We don't normally include fan art and there's no real reason we should in this case. Guy (Help!) 08:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.