Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/NWA Hall of Fame
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:36, 7 February 2009 [1].
Another professional wrestling hall of fame list, its pretty much based off its sister list. Any comments will be addressed.--TRUCO 23:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC) [reply]Comments The following comments have already been addressed pre-FLC, but I will post them here for convinience:
- "National Wrestling Alliance (NWA)" You already defined the abbreviation in the bolded phrase.
- "The Class of 2005, the inaugural inductees into the Hall of Fame did not have a formal induction ceremony," Comma at the end of this phrase should be a semicolon.
- "There were no inductees in 2007 due to the NWA planning an international expansion to the promotion." The noun -ing structure ("NWA planning") is ungrammatical. Reword.
- "which
alsoincluded" - "Kai is the only woman to be inducted into the Hall of Fame."-->Kai is the only woman to have been inducted into the Hall of Fame.
- "Overall, there were 21 inductees; two managers, commentators, and promoters, and fifteen wrestlers." "21"-->twenty-one.
- "The NWA Hall of Fame logo (2008-)" Hyphen should be an en dash.
- Fix the dab. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done all.--TRUCO 22:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good, but reviewers' opinions on this one would be welcome. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Publications should be in italics (The Sun, Ref 4). Also, what makes this a reliable source? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Well, The Sun is a tabloid, which is generally not reliable on Wikipedia. But the author Paul Heyman is a prime and reliable individual in the world of professional wrestling. He is the former owner of Extreme Championship Wrestling, worked for World Wrestling Entertainment for many years, and now reports for The Sun, so I find his work reliable. He also has connections with people in WWE, as he states in other reports.--TRUCO 23:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you provide a source or something that says Hayman did all that you said he did? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- About him and ECW, its in his book The Rise & Fall of ECW. About him in WWE, he states it in his report.--TRUCO 23:39, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems to meet WP:SPS, but I would still like other reviewers' input. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the source meets the requirement on WP:V.—Chris! ct 19:58, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- http://slam.canoe.ca/Slam/Wrestling/Bios/heyman_paul.html gives a good biography of Heyman, and it confirms that he has been a major player in the WWF, WCW, and ECW. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments For some reason, there is a large white space above the table. I think the images are too large and they push the table down.—Chris! ct 05:10, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Really? I don't see that on my browser [Firefox 3], are you referring to the white space due to the table of contents box creates, if not, then it must be your browser.--TRUCO 15:49, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I know why this happen. The table width is set to 80% and the images don't have enough room, pushing the table. Do you mind removing the set width on the table?—Chris! ct 00:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh okay, done.--TRUCO 00:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent, I support—Chris! ct 00:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Chris, could you comment on the above source issue? Dabomb87 (talk) 04:30, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent, I support—Chris! ct 00:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh okay, done.--TRUCO 00:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I know why this happen. The table width is set to 80% and the images don't have enough room, pushing the table. Do you mind removing the set width on the table?—Chris! ct 00:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.