Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 August 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< August 25 August 27 >

August 26

[edit]

Category:Metatitle pop

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:33, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. There does not appear to be a definition for this term and it does not appear to be in any sort of common usage. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 17:46, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:United States television episode stubs

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete/merge to Category:Television episode stubs. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:27, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. I tried to populate this category, but given that there's already sub-categories for episodes of comedy, drama, and science fiction episode stubs. this category seems redundant. Category should be deleted, and the few articles it contains can be upmerged to Category:Television episode stubs or one of its sub-categories. Fortdj33 (talk) 16:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC)----[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Family and early life

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: administrative close: speedily deleted by another editor. Good Ol’factory (talk) 18:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This category will probably only ever have one purpose, which is to host this person's user page. Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 15:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:More Turkey categories

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge/Delete/Rename per nomination. Note the bot may not fix everything, so manual editing of categories may be required to complete this. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Rename. WP uses Ottoman Empire not Turkey for periods before 1922. All lead to a single article. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also proposing:

From 1905 there are sporting sub-cats which are automatically populating annual categories, including category-redirects. I do not know how to fix this. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:03, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some of these may be tagged for rename rather than merge, due to the omission of "the". Peterkingiron (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I hope this is a complete nom. I am seeking to merge/rename years in Turkey to years in the Ottoman Empire, but to merge establishments into decades in the Ottoman Empire. One of the 1880s categories includes something for Egypt, which may be theoretically correct, but Egypt was (I think) effectively self-governing by then. If I have missed anything, please add it. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television awards for Best Younger Actor

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge both to Category:Awards for young actors and actresses; once it is populated as discussed, feel free to nominate the new category for deletion if users still feel it is inappropriate. Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:32, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: These categories are unnecessary (the 3 articles in them are in other categories), don't fit into the category tree (these categories are themselves uncategorized) and (if kept) would need to be renamed to avoid excessive capitalisation. DexDor (talk) 05:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How young is "young"? The Emmy cuts off at 25; the Young Artist Award at 21. Seyasirt (talk) 03:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The age does not matter at all. When a award uses Outstanding/Best Young, Youth, Child etc... Then the article will be used in this category. Also, the Oscars had a category named Academy Juvenile Award.  — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 17:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:SIGMOD Edgar F. Codd Innovations Award winners

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 18:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Having received this award is not a WP:DEFINING characteristic (see WP:OC#AWARD). For info: There is a list at SIGMOD Edgar F. Codd Innovations Award#Recipients. DexDor (talk) 05:29, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:20th-century Indian film actresses

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:20th-century Indian actresses and Category:Indian film actresses. Good Ol’factory (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This can be adequately covered by Category:20th-century Indian actresses and Category:Indian film actresses. No other subcategory of Category:20th-century actresses categorizes by medium. StAnselm (talk) 00:54, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:LSD users

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Good Ol’factory (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Delete. I don't think this is a good idea for a category, due to WP:BLP concerns. Also, this is rarely going to be a defining characteristic for anyone. Zagalejo^^^ 00:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_26&oldid=1138397672"