Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhang Zhenghua

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zhang Zhenghua

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Primary notability seems to be his claim to have founded a payment service about which we do not have an article . The refs are essentially PR DGG ( talk ) 02:18, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom.TH1980 (talk) 02:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:22, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi What is your reason for nominating this article for deletion? He is the founder and former CEO of Baidu Wallet and Finance and current CEO of UnPAY. see this article. MrInfo2012 Talk 05:05, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Zhang is the founder and CEO of UNPay at 30 years old. This company has international presence in payment system/ digital transaction industry. He is listed 40 Under 40 in Fortune. He has many other executive/ management roles in work experience.

SWP13 (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

REDIRECT to UnPAY, a horrible spammy article by the same page creator. Who I imagine is being paid.TheLongTone (talk) 16:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please decide about this article ASAP. TheLongTone Please talk about this article because Zhang is one of the young entrepreneurs of China and we don't have any page about him. I try to remove advertising element of UnPAY. MrInfo2012 Talk 05:09, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let's have a look at the sources:

Source assessment table
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.businessinsider.sg/UnPAY-in-talks-with-dubai-government-to-build-cashless-city/			About his product, not him.	✘ No
https://www.prunderground.com/UnPAY-supports-haier-laundrys-overseas-ventures-with-holistic-payment-solutions-2/00134728/			About his product, not him, quotes him once.	✘ No
https://t.sina.com.hk/news/article/20181107/0/2/40/UnPAY-and-President-of-Lithuania-In-Talks-on-Possible-Fintech-Cooperation-9400725.html	It's a press release.	Maybe yes for verifying stats but not notability.	All press releases will cover their topic in depth.	✘ No
https://t.sina.com.hk/news/article/20181107/0/2/40/UnPAY-and-President-of-Lithuania-In-Talks-on-Possible-Fintech-Cooperation-9400725.html	It's a press release.	Maybe yes for verifying stats but not notability.	All press releases will cover their topic in depth.	✘ No
http://fortune.com/2018/11/28/alipay-baidu-wallet-finance-UnPAY-digital-payments/			It covers him a lot, but it's all in the context of his product.	? Unknown
http://tech.qq.com/a/20180912/104402.htm		It's listcruft opinion piece on a site which, as far as I can see, has no editorial oversight.	He's a small subsection of the list.	✘ No
http://iof.hexun.com/2015-01-17/172484209.html		Unfamiliar with publication.	Mentions him once, about winning an award which doesn't appear to be notable per GNG.	✘ No
https://www.businessinsider.sg/the-fortune-global-tech-forum-UnPAY-wins-fortune-china-innovation-award-to-empower-digital-payment-4-0-worldwide/			Primary coverage is about his product, not him.	✘ No
http://sg.unpay.com/news/unpays-founder-zhang-zhenghua-named-in-fortune-chinas-2018-40-under-40-list/		Maybe for stats but not for assertions of notability.	Of course it is.	✘ No
https://www.fortuneconferences.com/fortune-global-tech-2018/2018-agenda/			Mentions him once and just asserts he spoke at a conference.	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Overall, I'd say this, along with the lack of further sources turned up by my own searches, suggests failure of ANYBIO, furthermore I agree with TheLongTone that this stinks of undisclosed paid editing, particularly as an article for UnPay was submitted pretty soon after this AFD was started. All in all, it's a delete from me. SITH (talk) 21:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@StraussInTheHouse: After I saw that DGG said It isn't obvious that Zhenghua doesn't offer financial services, I created UnPAY to prove that he is working on this area and participated in China financial services. It's because I create that article immediately after Zhenghua. I think Zhenghua has enough credibility such as any Chinese entrepreneurs to have a Wikipedia page. MrInfo2012 Talk 12:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I shall look at that article separately. I point out that the question isn't credibility, but whether the sources are sufficient to meet our standards. DGG ( talk ) 01:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Subject has coverage in foreign media; just happens to mostly be in Chinese. https://www.baidu.com/s?wd="章政华" -- dsprc ^[talk] 22:41, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Head of the company has enough notability, also the company has significant coverage in reliable sources. Benyamin-ln (talk) 21:03, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The question is solely of whether this meets our criteria for inclusion, and it does not. Sources are not sufficient in quality and the coverage is not significant enough in those sources that pass muster. As DGG rightly points out, it isn't an issue of credibility (or truth/accuracy/etc), it is a matter of passing the bar of WP:GNG, which this fails to do. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 14:19, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The refs don't confer notability and it looks Paid or COI. Szzuk (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.