Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachary Klima

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:23, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zachary Klima

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing evidence of notability after source search. I am not finding any significant coverage to show that this passes WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. The included sources are mostly interviews and do not pass as significant coverage. One major claim is a deal with Jeffrey Michael Jordan, but can't be used for notability per WP:FORBESCON as it was written by a contributor. 40 under 40 articles do not offer the kind of coverage we need for notability either.

There are also some signs of promotion, such as Klima has always possessed a knack for connecting with people, starting businesses at a young age. ASUKITE 02:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Software, California, and Michigan. ASUKITE 02:11, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete overly prmotional article on a minor businessman who is not even notable in the area where he works, let alone on a scale to jutify an article in an encyclopedia. If a one medtro area website lists you as one of their annual list of 40 people under 40 who they think will be impactful in business, that is clearly not a sign in and of itself you are notable. That is not a sign of notability at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, and WP:NOT. What a hot mess. This is a series of tweets, not an encyclopedia article. Bearian (talk) 19:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.