Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xonsh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:42, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Xonsh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT. There's a Linux Magazine review [1], and a few passing mentions in technical books, but I do not think that's significant enough. MarioGom (talk) 13:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 13:41, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even close to meet GNG. Orientls (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of coverage by reliable sources. Cortador (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The 2018 book by Cody Jackson is far from a passing mention, but I do say multiple sources, and I haven't found a second one yet. Jackson isn't enough by itself, not least because it lacks such basic information as the name of the inventor, that an encyclopaedia article would need. I can find no independent source that even says such basic stuff. Uncle G (talk) 22:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.