Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William David Sanders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Columbine High School massacre. postdlf (talk) 19:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

William David Sanders

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:SINGLEEVENT apply. Everything relevant here is already at Columbine High School massacre. There's really no reason for this man to have his own article. Beerest355 Talk 23:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - important individual who helped hundreds of students to safety. Also per WP:GNG, WP:NOTMEMORIAL does not apply here.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Columbine High School massacre. He is known only fort his incident and nothing else. A standalone article is not justified. -- Whpq (talk) 16:21, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as proposed above by Whpq as notability is derived from a WP:SINGLEEVENT. He was a selfless individual who lost his life at a significant event and is rightfully included in the article about the event. Kooky2 (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - Redirecting this to Columbine High School massacre seems to make more sense, as he is associated with that event only. More information about him that comes to light could be added there. A stand-alone article for one event, which put him in the news because of the tragedy, seems to be unjustified.--Zananiri (talk) 10:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.