Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimíra Krčková

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vladimíra Krčková

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:SINGER, also has very few sources covering her work. I found 3. One of them is good and can be used (but one source is not enough for notability - "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself")(https://www.idnes.cz/zpravy/archiv/vladimira-krckova-je-veru-renesancni-umelkyne-proc-se-nikdo-neujal-jejiho-alba.A120807_123120_kavarna_chu), one is an interview and therefore cannot be used to establish her notability (https://english.radio.cz/vladimira-krckova-a-young-jazz-singer-who-lives-prague-8576387), and one barely covers her at all (https://jazz.rozhlas.cz/jazzova-zpevacka-vladimira-krckova-pokrti-album-5178528?mob=1&print=1). The page has no other sources, and is just written like an advertisement. I tried working on the article myself but I don't believe it can be saved. It's also strange to me that she is a Czech singer and yet has no Czech Wikipedia page. Jaguarnik (talk) 04:25, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Barely any references, stuff like
decided to travel around the world and release all the memories and conditioning that were preventing her from creating as well as living her life
is not written in encyclopaedia language, in general the article feels promotional. Especially with its undue focus on her personal life or health, which is also completely unsourced. Ratnahastin (talk) 06:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Czech Republic. Kpg jhp jm 07:17, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for PROMO with flowery language and not much of anything in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 13:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can find nothing reliable beyond what the nominator found. Note that those articles are not only promotional but they're all from 2012, meaning that the singer and her management did a little promotional rush at that time and then nothing much happened. The article's prose is clearly a repeat of a self-written biography that was meant for potential fans and it is not encyclopedic. And forgive me, but recovering from depression doesn't make someone notable or even interesting when millions of other humble people have done the same. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:10, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of notability and agree with the reasons provided by DOOMSDAYER. Hkkingg (talk) 08:55, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no WP:SIGCOV. I removed the entirely unsourced "health" section as a serious BLP violation. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 08:35, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above fails WP:SINGER and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.