Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vertical penetration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vertical penetration

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't find any sources for this use of the title term. Dicklyon (talk) 04:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering, Mathematics, and Aviation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this looks like something the (all but SPA) creator made up one day. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:NOTGUIDE this one uses aircraft to explain it, but online this term can also refer to specifics of high rise building construction. Or any number of other uses. — Maile (talk) 14:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely unsourced article for which I cannot find any sources in a quick search so it appears to be WP:OR. Created back in 2009 when things were less strict, but that does not justify keeping it.

Delete - besides being original research, which we have never published, and everyone knows that in 2024, it's WP:BOLLOCKS. Bearian (talk) 22:05, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.