Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veejay (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 13:22, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Veejay (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability since 2010. No RS/IS/SIGCOV sources. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Visual arts, and Technology. UtherSRG (talk) 11:34, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 10:59, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. While there are only primary sources on the page, it is covered in the news and it is not all press-releases. Needs additional analysis to do a final verdict:
https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS909US914&q=Veejay (software)&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjDq9T3zv3_AhUWPUQIHa8vC_4Q0pQJegQIOxAB&biw=1920&bih=927&dpr=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Onetimememorial (talk • contribs) 22:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, has some decent coverage [1][2], I think this will meet GNG —siro χ o 12:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage, fails GNG and NSOFT. The google search provided by Onetimememorial does not contain any news coverage of this software; the articles about VJing as a concept do not mention this program at all (at least, the ones I get back from doing that search). I've looked at the sources Siroxo provided and both appear to be broad surveys of software and not significant coverage of this program specifically. The ACM source mentions Veejay only once in passing (Outstanding packages include FLxER, FreeJ, Gephex and Veejay, all of which work with video files and streams in ways analogous to the actions of audio disc jockeys). The IEEE source's abstract suggests it's a broad survey of 150,000 open source projects, but I do not have access to the full text. If @Siroxo or anyone else can provide sections of the IEEE article that do constitute significant coverage of the program I'd reconsider. Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 16:55, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.