Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uassist.ME

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uassist.ME

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:COMPANY. Forbes is a contributor version so not helpful, rest are announcements. Editor's article was rejected but moved themselves. Sheddy007 (talk) 23:23, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:39, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, The sources covering the company are legitimate news articles, and these prove its notability. It got achievements and ranked in the Inc. 5000. Article was rejected because I was new and didn't know how to cover everything and then I updated it to meet Wikipedia criteria. But now I wonder how this user:Sheddy007 come to Wikipedia and first thing he did made his first edit on this article, nominating it for deletion. I am new on Wikipedia and I didn't know about deletion process until now. --Ammie Sharon (talk) 13:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article was rejected at Articles for Creation due to lack of sourcing showing WP:NCORP. It was then moved to the main space by the creator. I checked the sources used and all are either press releases, passing mentions, a piece by a Forbes contributor (which does not count towards notability on Wikipedia) or a primary source. None of the awards help with notability. I also did some searching online and I found no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. It is WP:TOOSOON for this company to have an article. Missvain (talk) 22:03, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - likely undisclosed paid-for spam. I've blocked the author for this. MER-C 14:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.