Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USL Atlanta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to United Soccer League#Expansion clubs. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

USL Atlanta

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Without additional evidence of notability, this seems like it's WP:TOOSOON for this team to have it's own page, based on WP:NCORP and WP:NSPORT Comatmebro (talk) 21:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Every other upcoming expansion team gets one. Why would this one be different? DSM FC (talk) 14:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 21:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to United Soccer League#Expansion clubs for now, until the club is able to establish its notability. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy If DSM FC is so certain about these clubs he should of kept them on his userspace until they have done enough to qualify for inclusion on wiki. Govvy (talk) 16:14, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per The Bushranger. Giant Snowman 16:21, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - insufficient notability for a standalone article, but a plausible search term. Fenix down (talk) 16:51, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't care if you delete it, but it's bizarre to take issue with this when we have the exact same pages for Bimringham, Austin, and Memphis and articles for several other clubs that haven't played yet.DSM FC (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for pointing those out. I'll go and WP:BOLDly redirect them promptly. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:10, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment it seems the article has already been turned into a redirect to USL Atlanta at the time if this post. Inter&anthro (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Patrolling admin comment page was moved from USL Gwinnett County to USL Atlanta. I have updated the nomination. Primefac (talk) 15:34, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: My redirecting the other WP:TOOSOON as-yet-unnamed teams were reverted "per WP:REDYES" (which I don't quite understand, since there were no red links involved). @Walter Görlitz:, is that relevant to this discussion? - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:26, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Or delete all of the fourth-division teams who have had less press than this team. Sorrt, REDYES was an error. They are a second division team and as many of the editors above have stated, that makes the team notable. Double-standard much? Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, I don't see anybody above stating that...and the teams do not yet exist, that is the entire point. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to United Soccer League#Expansion clubs for now.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.