Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troop Messenger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:54, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Troop Messenger

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are mostly download portals and the like, trivial mentions, or articles that quoted the CEO / founder but do not include substantial information about the software. The only one that includes any real detail is the News18 source, (contains a couple paragraphs in an article going over several startup companies). But that is not the multiple independent sources required by WP:GNG. techstory.in has details but is highly promotional and the byline reads 'guest' - likely sponsored content. I've searched and haven't found better sourcing. It's not exactly a reason for deletion, but it is worth noting that the article creator looks like an undisclosed paid editor. MrOllie (talk) 14:46, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Though i never receive any financial stake for creating this page. i just created this page as i myself using this app. and i liked it. Moreover i also found the subject notable having enough citations from reliable resources. CommanderF1 (talk) 06:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. It has a dozen sources, mostly reviews of the product, but none of them are from major publications, and I couldn't find anything better in a search. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The last one.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 13:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.