Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trell (application)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 14:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trell (application)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appear to be a non-notable company with no significant coverage in reliable sources. I previously proposed this article for deletion but the pord tag was removed by anon so bringing it here. GSS ^💬 03:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:08, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see coverage from the Times of India and other sources, but it appears to be a one-off event about the wave of users that emerged after Indian authorities banned Tiktok. I can't find any other secondary coverage about the topic, at least on the anglophone and sinophone internet. Would propose that the article be deleted and redirected to the 2020 China–India skirmishes Indian response section. BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with {{SUBST:re|BrxBrx}})} 03:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:24, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 13:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added 10-12 reliable sources which are covering other than TikTok ban coverage. This helps for secondary coverage. Sonofstar (talk) 17:41, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the high quality sources added by Sonofstar. Mottezen (talk) 06:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.