Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transatlantic Partners Against AIDS
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. TheSandDoctor Talk 18:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Transatlantic Partners Against AIDS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only reference is their own press release from 2005. Doesnt seem to exist now. No real evidence of notability. Rathfelder (talk) 21:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing here except minor coverage some years ago. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Sdmarathe (talk) 00:04, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 21:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 21:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per others. Morgan Ginsberg (talk) 06:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: the only !vote since the last relist fails WP:EVERYONEELSE as a valid !vote
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dom from Paris (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisting comment: the only !vote since the last relist fails WP:EVERYONEELSE as a valid !vote
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dom from Paris (talk) 15:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: source searches show nothing of note, no significant coverage or the like, so it's a failure of organisation notability guidelines. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 18:47, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.