Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TnFOX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Fox toolkit. Star Mississippi 22:57, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TnFOX

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. There are no independent sources Mdggdj (talk) 14:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:49, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fox toolkit: no independent notability. Owen× ☎ 16:36, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are no valid references at TnFOX so you will not be able to move any content. A redirect to a page where there is no mention of the redirected article will be confusing. Mdggdj (talk) 09:33, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirection doesn't involve moving any content. To be included in a list on an existing article, all you need is verifiability, not notability. The existing sources are sufficient for that. Owen× ☎ 15:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.