Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Quiet Room (2018 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:09, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Quiet Room (2018 film)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lot of PR stuff, but does not appear to meet WP:NFILM or WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Glee^anon 11:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I waded through the Google results and found two reviews - this does need some further cleanup and I'll try to get to it tonight if I can. It's not the strongest keep, but there's enough to pass NFILM. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:54, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, I watched this on Shudder for the synopsis - this really is a great short, if anyone wants to watch a good, creepy short film during the spookiest month of the year! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets BASIC/GNG if not NFILM. Glee^anon 08:34, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per both WP:GNG and WP:NFILM, in addition to more sources at search times "The Quiet Room" and "Sam Wineman", at Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Right cite (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep The film has two reviews. Which is enough to pass NFILM. Although, it's still semi-borderline IMO and the other sources in the article that are extremely trivial or about other things should really be gotten rid of. AfDs aren't cleanup though. So, whatever. It is what it is. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:59, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY and the addition of more sources by ReaderofthePack. — Toughpigs (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.