Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Life and Times of M.C. Beer Bong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete both (11d/2k). Mindmatrix 22:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
256 Google hits This article has been on Wikipedia for over a year so many of the results are Wikimirrors. Someone's personal project. delete Lotsofissues 23:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Added related article M.C. Beer Bong. Delete both. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 17:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The movie is listed on IMDb. Punkmorten 00:11, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- EVERYTHING is listed under IMDB -- no matter how minor. Lotsofissues 05:20, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisting due to insufficient votes. - Mailer Diablo 09:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. We don't need to cover every film in IMDB, really. Soo 11:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Unusual feature on Asian rapper. International film festivals and IMDB. -- JJay 13:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yes, it's on IMDB, but it only has seven votes there, and the budget is listed as $1000. Come on. People will want articles on their vacation slides next. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:39, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not, but only if the slides are shown at major film festivals, get press coverage and released on DVD, like Beer Bong. -- JJay 14:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per JJay Jcuk 20:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seriously, an IMDB page and a showing at a festival makes something encyclopedic? Its frigging IMDB doesn't have a single newsgroup review, not to mention an external review. Flyboy Will 00:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. IMDB is not a reliable source, because its submission standards are almost as low as Wikipedia's. I could tape something in my basement today and have it on IMDB by next week. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 04:32, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Both are unverifiable; IMDb not reliable in this case. Xoloz 20:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, off you go. Stifle 13:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both.--nixie 12:32, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ambi 06:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. utcursch | talk 08:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.